Search Results for "Order VII Rule 11(d)"

21 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 21 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in SARFAESI Act Suit. Court Holds That Bar Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act Is Not Absolute and Civil Court Retains Jurisdiction to Examine Legality of Proceedings.

The petitioners, Jalgaon Peoples Co-operative Bank Ltd. and its authorized officer, challenged an order dated 27.09.2016 passed by the 6th Joint Civil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Permanent Injunction Suit — Plaint Rejected as Barred by Law Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC. Non-Disclosure of Cause of Action and Prior Litigation Between Parties Led to Rejection of Plaint as Abuse of Process.

The present case arises from a civil revision petition filed by the defendants (petitioners) against an order of the III Additional Civil Judge, Vijay...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in SARFAESI Act Suit. Civil Court's Jurisdiction Not Barred Where Tenant Claims Independent Tenancy Rights Under Section 17(4A) and 13(4) of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The Bombay High Court at Nagpur dismissed a civil revision application filed by Dena Bank (defendant no.2) challenging an order of the trial court tha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Property Dispute. Res Judicata and Limitation Grounds Not Applicable as Earlier Co-operative Court Judgment Was Set Aside and Subsequent Civil Suit Involves Different Cause of Action.

The petitioner, Ganesh Keshav Patole, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 30 March 2016 pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Rejection of Plaint in Partition Suit — Suit Barred by Limitation and Res Judicata. Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC applied as plaint disclosed no cause of action and was barred by limitation under Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The petitioners, original defendants in a civil suit, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 28.11.201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Rejection of Preliminary Issue on Limitation in Civil Suit — Limitation Issue Held to be Mixed Question of Law and Fact Not Triable Under Section 9A CPC

The petitioners, who were defendants in Regular Civil Suit No.766 of 2012 pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Panvel, challenged the comm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Specific Performance Suit. Partnership Firm's Unregistered Status Does Not Bar Suit by Partners in Individual Capacity Under Section 69(2) of Indian Partnership Act, 1932.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the petitioner, Mangilal Jagrupji Jain, who was defendant no.3 in a suit for specific performa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Rent Recovery Suit. Denial of Landlord-Tenant Relationship Raises Triable Issue Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC.

The petitioner, original defendant in Regular Civil Suit No.447/2009, filed a Civil Revision Application challenging the order dated 23.09.2010 passed...