Search Results for "Order 47 Rule 1 CPC"

30 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 30 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Petitioner's challenge to SRA's refusal to grant occupancy certificate fails as review court finds no mistake or error in original judgment.

The petitioner, Mumtaz H. Khoja, filed a review petition against the judgment dated 16 October 2025 passed by the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Specific Performance Suit — No Error Apparent on Record Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC. Promoter of Proposed Cooperative Society Held to Have Locus Standi to Sue for Specific Performance Despite Society Being Unregistered.

The case arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 12 August 1981. The plaintiff, Respondent No.1, as chief promoter ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petitions in Urban Land Ceiling Case — No Error Apparent on Record Found. Review petitions under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC seeking review of order dated 17/06/2016 in WP Nos.54609-54610/2014(ULC) dismissed as no error apparent on record.

The review petitions were filed by M/s Vivekananda Foundation (R), claiming to be the allottee of a portion of land in Sy.Nos.81 and 82 of Kasaba Hobl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Electricity Tariff Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record Found. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to errors apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used to re-argue the merits of the case.

The judgment pertains to four Civil Review Applications (Nos. 23, 24, 25 and 26 of 2011) filed by industrial consumers against the State of Goa and th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Eviction Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review of judgment dated 21.10.2010 in Writ Petition No.711/2010 rejected as applicants sought re-argument of merits, not review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.

The applicants, tenants Shrichand s/o Rochaldas Khemani and Kawarlal s/o Rochaldas Khemani, filed a review application before the Bombay High Court, N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Compassionate Appointment Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review of writ appeal order denied as petitioner failed to show any error apparent on face of record under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC.

The petitioner, K. Lokesh, filed a review application under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking review...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Review Applications in Service Benefits Case — No Error Apparent in Original Order Confirmed by Supreme Court. Review Applicants Sought Service Benefits Including Promotions and Revision of Pay but Failed to Show Any Error Apparent on Face of Record Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.

The applicants, employees of the Adi Dravidar Welfare Department, filed review applications under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Review Application in Service Matter — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review of dismissal of writ petition challenging non-consideration of claim for correction of date of birth rejected as review not an appeal in disguise.

The applicant, Taterao s/o Mahadu Bagul, an Additional Collector in Nandurbar, filed a review application (Stamp No.22202 of 2016) before the High Cou...