Search Results for "Notice Requirement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Notice Requirement"

8720 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8720 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds No-Confidence Motion Against Adhyaksha of Gram Panchayat — Motion Valid Despite Absence of Prior Notice Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.

6 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Smt. C. Pushpa, was the Adhyaksha (President) of K. Bettahalli Gram Panchayat. She filed a writ petition challenging a no-confidence m...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Land Reservation Lapses Only Upon Valid Notice Under Section 127 of MRTP Act, Not Mere Passage of Time. The court ruled that without a valid notice under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, the High Court cannot declare reserved land free from reservation even after an inordinate delay.

13 Mar 2023

The case involves two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, by three pet...

High Court

Madras High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Mutation of Revenue Records Without Notice. Petitioner Seeks to Quash Entry of Sixth Respondent’s Name in Town Survey Register, Alleging Violation of Natural Justice and Title Dispute Based on Will.

11 Mar 2025

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the entry of t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Challenge to Division Bench Setting Aside Arbitral Award in Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Dispute — Key Reasons Involve Interpretation of Contractual Notice Conditions and Waiver by Estoppel. Specific Legal Finding That Drove The Verdict: The Court's analysis focused on whether the Division Bench erred in interfering under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with the Arbitral Tribunal's interpretation of contract provisions regarding notice requirements and whether such interference was justified on grounds of patent illegality or violation of Section 28(3).

1 Jan 1970

The litigation arose from an EPC contract dispute between SEPCO Electric Power Construction Corporation (contractor) and GMR Kamalanga Energy Ltd. (ow...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to Executive Instruction Requiring Environmental Clearance for Quarry Permits Under Maharashtra Minor Mineral Extraction Rules, 2013. Petitioners Contend Rule 59 Governs Short-Term Permits and Does Not Mandate Prior Environmental Clearance, Unlike Rule 11(5)(f) for Quarry Leases, and Executive Instructions Cannot Override Statutory Rules.

14 Oct 2022

These three writ petitions were filed before the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court by two stone crusher owners' associations and one individual pr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Resurrects Issue of Mandatory Naval NOC in Development Near Defence Establishments. The Court Examines Validity of Stop Work Notice and Deemed Commencement Certificate Under DCPR 2034, Citing Precedents and Regulatory Vacuum.

5 May 2026

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the stop work notice dated 24 October 2025 issued by MHADA and ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat President for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Period. Notice period of 15 days under Section 49(2A) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 is mandatory and cannot be waived; motion passed on 14th day invalid.

1 Feb 2025

The petitioner, Smt. Sharanamma, was the President of Hiresingangutti Gram Panchayat. A no-confidence motion was moved against her by 18 members of th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes No-Confidence Motion Notice Against APMC President for Violating Mandatory 15-Day Notice Period Under Section 49(3) of the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966. The court held that the notice period of 12 days from 17.10.2013 to 29.10.2013 was invalid as it did not provide the required 15 clear days.

28 Oct 2013

The petitioner, Smt. Tharadevi, was the President of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Batawade, Tumkur. On 30.09.2013, 12 elected mem...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in SEBI PFUTP Regulations Case Due to Non-Disclosure of Investigation Report. The Court Held That the Investigation Report Under Regulation 9 Must Be Disclosed to Ensure a Fair Hearing Under Principles of Natural Justice, as It Forms the Basis for the Show Cause Notice.

18 Feb 2022

The dispute arose from a show cause notice issued by SEBI to the appellant, alleging violations of the SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trad...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Landlord's Appeal in Rent Eviction Case Due to Tenant's Waiver of Notice Defect. The Court held that the tenant waived the objection to non-compliance with the six-month notice requirement under the proviso to Section 21(1)(a) of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, by not raising it in earlier proceedings.

8 Dec 2021

The dispute arose under the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, involving an eviction proceeding initiated by t...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)