High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Appeals Filed Against Single Judge Order in Land Acquisition Matters Involving KIADB. Appeals Challenge Order Dated 04.07.2025 in Various Writ Petitions Filed by Landowners and Developers.
29 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "Nominal member"
216 result(s) found
Found 216 result(s)
High Court
Gujarat High Court Allots Special Civil Application Challenging Baroda Cricket Association Election Candidates' Eligibility. Court Grants Ad-Interim Relief Permitting Voting but Restrains Counting of Votes Pending Final Disposal of Petition.
16 Mar 2026The present matter before the Gujarat High Court concerned a challenge to the candidature of four individuals for the posts of President, Secretary, a...
- 26
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Appointment of Administrator and Cancellation of General Body Meeting in Cooperative Housing Society Dispute. Court holds that Registrar's order appointing administrator without affording hearing to the managing committee and cancelling requisitioned general body meeting was violative of principles of natural justice and provisions of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.
19 Nov 2025The petitioners, members of Malboro House Cooperative Housing Society Limited, challenged the order dated 10 October 2025 passed by the Divisional Joi...
- 264
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Rent Fixation Dispute Between Co-operative Society and Member. Maharashtra Rent Control Act Held Applicable to Industrial Co-operative Society's Premises Despite Society's Bye-laws.
3 Nov 2025The petitioner, The Ichalkaranji Industrial Co-operative Estate Ltd., a society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, challenge...
- 98
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Declaration Suit — Concurrent Findings of Ownership Based on Will Upheld. Court holds that concurrent findings of fact cannot be interfered with under Section 100 CPC unless perverse or based on no evidence.
11 Jul 2025The Regular Second Appeal was filed by the defendant-appellant against the concurrent judgment and decree of the Trial Court and First Appellate Court...
- 57
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench the Question Whether Mere Membership of a Banned Organization is Punishable Under Section 10 of UAPA, 1967 — Earlier Decisions in Arup Bhuyan and Raneef Holding That Mere Membership Does Not Incriminate Without Violence or Incitement Are Reconsidered as Union of India Was Not Heard.
24 Mar 2023This judgment arises from a reference to a larger Bench of the Supreme Court of India, questioning the correctness of the decisions in Arup Bhuyan v. ...
- 358
High Court
Regular First Appeal Against Common Judgment Decreeping Suit for Perpetual Injunction and Dismissing Suit for Declaration That Sale Deeds Are Not Binding on Co-Parceners. Dispute Centered on Whether Property Was Joint Family Asset or Self-Acquired and Validity of Sale Deeds Executed by Karta or Power of Attorney Holder.
27 Jan 2020The appeals arose from two suits tried together. One suit (O.S.No.1611/1994) was filed by the plaintiffs, claiming to be co-parceners of an undivided ...
- 10
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Borrower's Writ Petition Challenging Award and Sale of Mortgaged Property under Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 1984; Bank's Recovery Proceedings and Second Sale Upheld. The Court ruled that the petitioner, as a nominal member of the bank, was bound by the loan documents and statutory provisions, and his delayed allegations of fraud and membership were insufficient to set aside the finalized award and sales.
21 Mar 2017The petitioner, a businessman, obtained a loan of Rs.96,00,000/- from the Goa State Co-operative Bank Ltd. on 17.8.1995 for construction purposes. The...
- 10
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Insolvency Case, Holds Insolvency Court Has Jurisdiction Over Stranger Claims Under Presidency Towns Insolvency Act. The court set aside the Single Judge's order that the insolvency court lacked jurisdiction to entertain proceedings against a stranger claiming tenancy rights, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
20 Jun 2013The case involves two appeals arising from a decision of a Learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in insolvency proceedings under the Presidenc...
- 51
