Search Results for "Negotiable Instruments"

1379 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1379 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. Directors Not In Charge of or Responsible for Conduct of Business at Relevant Time Under Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The judgment pertains to two criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by Mr. H.S. Bedi (Managing Director) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Cheque Bounce Case — Concurrent Findings of Conviction Upheld. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands unless rebutted by accused with probable defence.

The present criminal revision petition was filed under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the concurrent findings of con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Complainant in Cheque Dishonour Cases, Convicts Accused. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not rebutted by accused who stopped payment without valid cause, and dispute with third party not a defence.

The case involves three parties: Hewlett Packard (HP), Kores (India) Ltd. (complainant/appellant), and M/s Ambitious Marketing (accused/respondent). K...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Cause of Action Arises from Second Notice When First Notice Not Served. Complaint Filed Within Limitation Based on Second Notice Dated 16th April 2003 and 21st April 2003.

The appellant, Praveen Otarmal Parmar, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondents, M/s. Abhir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Section 143-A of Negotiable Instruments Act Directory — Interim Compensation Requires Recording of Reasons. Court clarifies that Section 143-A is not mandatory and reasons must be recorded for quantum under Section 143-A(2).

The judgment arises from two criminal writ petitions filed by Ashwin Ashokrao Karokar (accused) against Laxmikant Govind Joshi (complainant) under the...