Search Results for "Namakkal"

83 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 83 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition in Land Encroachment Case — Directs Authorities to Treat Final Notice as Show Cause Notice. Procedural Fairness Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 Requires Prior Opportunity of Hearing Before Eviction.

The writ petitioner, K. Kanagaraj, filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging a notice i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Allegation of Sexual Assault Fails as Victim's Testimony Contradicted by Medical Evidence and Delay in FIR.

The appellant, Manikandan, was convicted by the Sessions (Fast Track Mahila) Judge, Namakkal, for offences under Sections 5(l) and 5(j)(ii) of the Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement Holder Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Continuous Readiness and Willingness Must Be Established Throughout the Period of Contract Under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 10.06.2006. The plaintiff, T.K.Kandhaswamy, sought to enforce the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Notice Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 — Non-Speaking Final Notice Held Valid as No Adjudication Required at Section 6 Stage. Petitioners Failed to Exhaust Statutory Appeal Remedy Under Section 10 of the Act.

The petitioners, Karupayee and Thangamani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Disposes of Writ Petition Seeking Removal of Encroachment on Water Body and Pathway After Encroachment Removed. Court directs petitioner to approach competent authority for cancellation of patta if illegally granted.

The petitioner, K. Ponnusamy, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Mandamus to direct the District C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Husband's Appeal in Hindu Marriage Act Divorce Case Based on Joint Compromise. Family Court Dismissal Set Aside and Divorce Granted in Terms of Compromise Memo Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.

The appeal arose from the dismissal of a divorce petition by the Family Court, Namakkal. The appellant/husband had filed F.C.O.P.No.335 of 2022 under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Habeas Corpus Petition After Detention Order Revoked by Government. Preventive detention order under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 set aside by competent authority, rendering petition infructuous.

The petitioner, Rajkumar, son of the detenu Ganesan, filed a Habeas Corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras H...