Madras High Court Allows Petitioner to Submit Explanation in Land Encroachment Case — Final Notice Treated as Show Cause Notice Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905. Court directed that a final notice under Section 6 of the Act be treated as a show cause notice under Section 7 to afford an opportunity of hearing before eviction.

High Court: Madras High Court
  • 15
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, K. Kanagaraj, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging a notice issued under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 (1905 Act) by the second respondent, the Tahsildar of Sendhamangalam Taluk, Namakkal District. The petitioner's grievance was that the final notice under Section 6 was issued without first issuing a show cause notice under Section 7 of the 1905 Act, thereby depriving him of the opportunity to submit his explanation and defend his possession of the house property situated at New S.No.390/9 (Old Survey No.30/1) of Kasthuripatti Village, Sendhamangalam Taluk. The petitioner sought a writ of certiorarified mandamus to quash the notice dated 13.03.2026 and to restrain the respondents from interfering with his possession pending disposal of a civil suit in O.S.No.10 of 2025 before the District Munsif Court, Sendhamangalam. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 to 3 submitted that the Section 6 notice could be treated as a show cause notice under Section 7 to enable the petitioner to submit his explanation, as there was no reference to any prior show cause notice. The court, in view of the facts and circumstances, treated the Section 6 notice dated 09.01.2025 as a show cause notice under Section 7 and granted the petitioner two weeks from the date of receipt of the order to submit his explanation along with documents. Thereafter, the authorities were directed to consider the explanation and take a final decision by issuing a fresh notice under Section 6 before proceeding with enforcement actions if any encroachment is identified. The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Land Law - Encroachment - Show Cause Notice - Section 6 and Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 - The petitioner challenged a final notice under Section 6 issued without a prior show cause notice under Section 7, depriving him of an opportunity to submit his explanation. The court, with consent of the government pleader, treated the Section 6 notice as a show cause notice under Section 7 and directed the petitioner to submit his explanation within two weeks, after which the authorities shall consider and issue a fresh final notice under Section 6 before taking enforcement action. Held that the principles of natural justice require a prior opportunity of hearing before a final order of eviction is passed. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the issuance of a final notice under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 without prior show cause notice under Section 7 violates principles of natural justice.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court treated the notice issued under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 dated 09.01.2025 as a show cause notice under Section 7. The petitioner was granted two weeks from the date of receipt of the order to submit his explanation along with documents. Thereafter, the authorities shall consider the explanation and take a final decision by issuing a notice under Section 6 before proceeding with enforcement actions. The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • opportunity of hearing
  • show cause notice
  • final notice treated as show cause notice
  • Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act
  • 1905
  • Section 6
  • Section 7
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (04) 134

W.P.No.12503 of 2026

2026-04-01

S. M. Subramaniam, K. Surender

Mr.S.Saravankumar (for petitioner), Mr.T.Arun Kumar, Additional Government Pleader (for R1 to R3)

K. Kanagaraj

The District Collector, Namakkal District; The Tahsildar, Sendhamangalam Taluk, Namakkal District; The Village Administrative Officer, Varadharajapuram Village, Sendhamangalam Taluk, Namakkal District; The Tamil Nadu Information Commission, Rep. By its Registrar, Chennai

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a final notice under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of certiorarified mandamus to quash the notice dated 13.03.2026 and to restrain respondents from interfering with his possession of the house property pending disposal of a civil suit.

Filing Reason

The petitioner alleged that a final notice under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 was issued without a prior show cause notice under Section 7, depriving him of an opportunity to submit his explanation.

Previous Decisions

A civil suit in O.S.No.10 of 2025 was pending before the District Munsif Court, Sendhamangalam.

Issues

Whether the issuance of a final notice under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 without a prior show cause notice under Section 7 violates principles of natural justice.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the final notice under Section 6 was issued without a show cause notice under Section 7, depriving him of an opportunity to submit his explanation. Respondents (through Additional Government Pleader) submitted that the Section 6 notice could be treated as a show cause notice under Section 7 to enable the petitioner to submit his explanation.

Ratio Decidendi

The principles of natural justice require that before a final order of eviction under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 is passed, the affected person must be given an opportunity of hearing by way of a show cause notice under Section 7. If a final notice is issued without such prior notice, it can be treated as a show cause notice to cure the procedural defect.

Judgment Excerpts

The only grievance of the writ petitioner is that before issuing a show cause notice under Section 7 of 'the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 (Tamil Nadu Act III of 1905)', a final notice under Section 6 of the 1905 Act was issued, thereby, depriving the petitioner of the opportunity to submit his explanation defending his case. In view of the above facts and circumstances, the notice issued under Section 6 of the 1905 Act on 09.01.2025 is treated as a show cause notice under Section 7 of the 1905 Act and the petitioner is at liberty to submit his explanation along with documents, if any, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging a notice under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905. The court heard the matter and disposed of it on 01.04.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905: Section 6, Section 7
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows Petitioner to Submit Explanation in Land Encroachment Case — Final Notice Treated as Show Cause Notice Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905. Court directed that a final notice under Section 6 of the Act be treated a...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Lease of Playground to Trust for School Construction. Lease of Public Land for Educational Purpose Held Valid as Playground Not Reserved as Recreational Ground in Development Plan.