Search Results for "Mysore Civil Service Rules"

454 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 454 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Shiksha Karmis in Bias and Natural Justice Conflict. Breach of Audi Alteram Partem Cured by Revisional Hearing Where No Actual Bias Proved Under Section 40(c) of Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993.

The case involves four civil appeals arising from a split verdict of the Supreme Court regarding the validity of appointments of Shiksha Karmi (Grade ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Withdrawal of Registrar Appointment in University Service Matter — Violation of Natural Justice. Appointment under Section 17 of Karnataka State Universities Act, 2000 cannot be withdrawn without affording opportunity of hearing.

The petitioner, Dr. C. Basavaraju, was appointed as Professor of Law by the University of Mysore on 12.07.2007 and was granted annual increments. In e...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Government Order Appointing Administrator for Vyasaraja Mutt. Petitioners Allege That the Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997 Does Not Apply to the Mutt and Seek Quashing of the Administrator's Appointment.

The case involved two writ petitions filed in the High Court of Karnataka challenging the Government orders dated 26.05.2012 appointing an administrat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses IAS Officer's Challenge to Compulsory Retirement in Public Interest. Service Record Including Adverse Entries and Minor Punishment Justified Action Under Rule 16(3) of All India Services (Death-Cum-Retirement Benefits) Rules, 1958.

The petitioner, Paramjeet Singh Bhogal, an IAS officer of the 1967 batch allotted to Maharashtra Cadre, challenged the order of compulsory retirement ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Recruitment Rules of 2015, Dismisses Petition Challenging RFO Seniority List. Petitioners' reliance on superseded 1998 Rules and failure to include all affected parties lead to dismissal; seniority list validated under 2015 Rules.

The petitioners challenged the seniority list based on the Recruitment Rules of 1998, arguing against the application of the Recruitment Rules of 2015...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds/Quashes (Outcome Not Specified) Circular and Seniority List in Reservation Promotions Dispute. Petitions by General Category Officers Challenging Implementation of Reservation in Promotions for SC/ST in KPTCL on Grounds of Non-Compliance with Supreme Court Directives.

These three writ petitions were filed by officers of the Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (KPTCL) belonging to the General Category, a...