Search Results for "Motor Vehicles Rules"

470 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 470 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Transport Authority in Motor Vehicles Act Case on Vehicle Replacement Rule. Kerala Motor Vehicle Rule 174(2)(c) Validated as It Does Not Exceed Section 83 and Serves Public Safety by Prohibiting Older Vehicle Replacements.

The Supreme Court of India addressed a dispute concerning the validity of Rule 174(2)(c) of the Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989, which allows the tra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes RTA Resolution Mandating 1300 cc Engine for Contract Carriage Permits — Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Regional Transport Authority Cannot Impose Conditions Beyond Those Specified in Section 74 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The petitioner, Mumbai Pune Taxi Owners Association, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, comprising taxi owners operating...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Tribunal's Order in Entry Tax Case — Chassis Entry Tax Levy Set Aside as Chassis Not 'Goods' Under Entry Tax Act After Integration into Bus Body.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax and the Entry Tax Officer, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Dispute — Upholds Consumer Fora Orders for Compensation. Ownership of Vehicle Not Transferred Despite Sale Agreement; Insurer Liable to Pay Claim Amount with Interest.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Surendra Kumar Bhilawe against The New India Assurance Company Limited, setting aside the National Commi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Working Hours Provisions in Motor Transport Workers Act. Court upholds sections 13 and 16 of Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961 as constitutionally valid and not violative of Articles 14 and 21.

The petitioner, BEST Worker's Union, claiming to be an approved and representative union for employees in the transport section of Brihanmumbai Electr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Seeking Directions to Motor Accidents Claims Tribunals for Compliance with Procedural Rules. Court Holds That Insistence on Personal Appearance of Claimants at Filing Is Not Mandatory Under Rule 254(2) of Maharashtra Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989.

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Anil Prabhakar Tadkalkar, a practicing advocate, raising several issues concerning the disposal of claim ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Working Hours Provisions of Motor Transport Workers Act. Provisions Permitting Extended Hours and Spread Over Upheld as Reasonable and Not Violative of Articles 14 and 21.

The petitioner, BEST Worker's Union, claiming to be an approved representative union for employees of Brihanmumbai Electric Supply and Undertaking (BE...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Bus Owner in Motor Accident Claim — Owner Held Liable for Compensation Due to Invalid Permit and Route Violation. Concurrent findings of fact that vehicle was plied without valid permit and on unauthorized route upheld; no interference warranted.

The appeal arose from a motor accident claim where the deceased, a 24-year-old Managing Director of a company, died in a collision with a bus owned by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Sales Tax Case on Handling Charges. Handling charges for registration of motor cycles are not part of sale price under Section 2(25) of MVAT Act, 2002.

The Revenue appealed against an order of the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal which set aside tax on handling charges collected by the respondent, a dea...