Search Results for "MoU"

306 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 306 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Despite Unstamped MOU. Stamp Objection Is for Arbitral Tribunal to Decide, Not a Bar to Appointment of Arbitrator.

The applicants, Nilesh Shantilal Tank and Praful Shantilal Tank, filed an arbitration petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in MoU Dispute Over Flat Area — Petitioner's Obligation to Sell 1 Lac Sq. Ft. Upheld. Arbitrator's Plausible Interpretation of Contract Not Interfered With Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Bombay High Court dismissed an arbitration petition filed by The Bombay Dyeing And Manufacturing Co. Ltd. challenging an arbitral award passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition in Development Dispute — Directs Deposit of Rs.12.5 Crores and Appointment of Court Receiver. Clause 6 of MOU for Refund on Default Forms Basis for Interim Relief Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, four individuals, entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the respondent, a developer, on 29 July 2011 for development ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Against Order Refusing Interim Relief in Development Agreement Dispute. Court Upholds Trial Court's Discretion in Refusing Injunction Where Balance of Convenience Favored Status Quo and No Irreparable Loss Was Shown.

The appellant, Villa Realcon LLP, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order dated September...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses ONGC's Challenge to Arbitral Award Rejecting Claim as Time-Barred. Claim for pre-project expenses under MOU held barred by limitation as expenditure incurred prior to April 2001 and claim raised after three years.

The Petitioner, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC), challenged an arbitral award dated 12 November 2009 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Land Procurement Dispute — Refund of Rs.91 Lakhs Upheld as Petitioner Failed to Prove Land Procurement Under MOU.

The petitioner, Manvel Tuscano, sole proprietor of M/s. Manvel Land Empire, and the respondent, DLF Limited, a real estate developer, entered into a m...