Search Results for "Minimum Export Price"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Minimum Export Price"

43 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 43 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Import Restriction for Areca Nuts — Condition Requiring NOC from FSSAI Held Ultra Vires. Import Policy Condition Violates Article 19(1)(g) and Article 14 of Constitution as It Lacks Statutory Authority and Is Disproportionate.

2 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Siddhi Vinayak, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1913, engaged in the import of areca nuts (commonly kn...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Cancellation of Advance Authorizations for Import of Areca Nuts — Violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Non-Application of Mind. Import of Areca Nuts under Advance Authorization Scheme for Export of Betel Nuts (Supari) Held Permissible Under Foreign Trade Policy 2015-2020.

24 Jul 2018

The petitioners, Taj Agro Commodities Pvt. Ltd., Shadi-Ram & Sons Pvt. Ltd., and Himatlal Hirji & Co., were granted advance authorizations under the F...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Cancellation of Advance Authorizations Under Foreign Trade Policy — Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Application of Mind by DGFT. The court quashed cancellation orders and directed fresh hearing, holding that quasi-judicial authorities must follow principles of natural justice before revoking licenses under the Foreign Trade Policy.

13 Jul 2018

The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed by Taj Agro Commodities Pvt. Ltd., Shadi-Ram & Sons Pvt. Ltd., and Himatlal Hirji & Co. challengin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Seed Inspector's Entry and Seizure Without Authorization Under Seeds Act, 1966. Entry and seizure of seeds from storage area without prior authorization under Section 14 of Seeds Act, 1966 held illegal and without jurisdiction.

21 Feb 2018

The petitioner, Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co. (Pvt.) Ltd., is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in the business of research, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

23 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Assumes Suo Motu Jurisdiction to Address COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis in Distribution of Essential Supplies and Services. The Court directed the Union of India to report on coordination, allocation, and management of oxygen, essential drugs, vaccination, and medical infrastructure under the Disaster Management Act, 2005, emphasizing a bounded-deliberative approach without usurping executive roles.

30 Apr 2021

The Supreme Court of India initiated a suo motu writ petition in response to the unprecedented humanitarian crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Case: EOU Job Work for DTA Unit Without Export Violates EXIM Policy. The Court held that a 100% EOU cannot undertake job work for a DTA unit and clear finished goods to the DTA without exporting them, and such clearance is not eligible for concessional duty under Notification No.8/97-CE.

6 Mar 2020

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur against the CESTAT order that allowed the appeals of M/s Universal Ferro & A...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Competition Commission of India and Kapoor Glass in Abuse of Dominance Case — No Abuse Found in Volume Discounts and Contractual Terms by Dominant Glass Tubing Manufacturer. The court held that volume discounts are not per se abusive under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, and that the evidence did not establish anti-competitive foreclosure or refusal to supply.

30 Jun 2025

The case arises from an information filed by Kapoor Glass India Pvt. Ltd. on 25 May 2010 under Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002, alleging that ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Foreign Trade Act Case -- Interpretation of Date of Notification as Gazette Publication Date -- Transitional Protection Granted to Importers With Prior Letters of Credit

21 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court allowed civil appeals filed by Appellants against the Union of India, challenging a Notification imposing Minimum Import Price on st...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State's Power to Prohibit Export of Sand Under MMDR Act - Gujarat Rules Restricting Inter-State Sand Movement Held Valid. The Court held that the prohibition on export of sand was a reasonable restriction under Article 304(b) of the Constitution, aimed at preventing illegal mining and conserving natural resources.

1 Mar 2019

The case involves appeals by the State of Gujarat against the Gujarat High Court's judgment striking down Rules that prohibited the export of ordinary...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)