Search Results for "Metro Construction"

106 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 106 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Metro Construction Method as Withdrawn, Imposes Costs for Abuse of Process. Court finds the petition was filed with oblique motive to pressurize the developer for personal demands, not genuine public interest.

The petitioner, Dr. Monica Matani, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court complaining about the construction method ado...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Order in Tender Dispute Involving Foreign Sovereign Funding. High Court Erred in Interfering with Technical Bid Rejection Under Article 226 as Project Funded by Japanese Loan with Non-Negotiable Terms Under Memorandum of Understanding.

The dispute arose from a tender process for the Mumbai-Ahmedabad High Speed Rail Project, where the National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited (NHSR...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Judgment on Interpretation of Section 24 Proviso in Land Acquisition Act. The proviso to Section 24 of the 2013 Act governs Section 24(2), not Section 24(1)(b), as held in Delhi Metro Rail Corporation v. Tarun Pal Singh.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals challenging the Division Bench judgment in Delhi Metro Rail Corporation v. Tarun Pal Singh, which held that th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Compensation Payment for Land Acquired for Chennai Metro Rail Project - No Objection Letter Required from Housing Board. Landowner's Entitlement to Compensation Recognized Based on Allotment Order and Sale Deeds Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, M. Krishnaveni, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the second r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Royalty Demand on Excavated Earth from Metro Project. Excavated earth from underground metro construction not 'minor mineral' under Notification dated 3 February 2000; no royalty payable.

The petitioner, Tata Projects Limited, a member of a consortium executing the Mumbai Metro Underground Project, filed a writ petition under Article 22...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Declaring Income Tax Exemption Under Section 96 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Applicable to Land Acquisitions Under KIAD Act, 1966. Compensation for Land Acquisition Under State Act Entitled to Same Tax Exemption as Under Central Act.

The petitioners, M/s Sri Balaji Corporate Services and NCC Urban Infrastructure Limited, along with individual landowners, challenged the denial of in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Land Owners' Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case. Solatium Under Section 30(1) of the 2013 Act Held Calculable Only on Market Value and Assets, Excluding Additional 12% Under Section 30(3).

The case involves two Special Leave Petitions filed by land owners whose land was acquired for the Metro Railway project under the Metro Railways (Con...