Search Results for "Master Asset Purchase Agreement"

67 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 67 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Shareholder Dispute Over Hotel Company Exit — Holds That Arbitrator Exceeded Jurisdiction by Granting Relief Beyond Scope of Reference and Without Proper Valuation.

The judgment pertains to two Commercial Arbitration Petitions arising from an arbitral award dated 5th April 2016. The petitioners (Panchamias Group a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.

The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds DRAT Order Requiring 25% Pre-deposit for Waiver of Appeal Under SARFAESI Act. Legal Heirs of Guarantor Must Deposit 25% of Section 13(2) Notice Amount as Condition for Hearing Appeal on Merits.

The petitioners, Smt. Julie Amitabh Parekh and others, who are the legal heirs of the deceased guarantor Amitabh Arun Parekh, filed a writ petition ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award on Termination and Repudiation of Master Asset Purchase Agreement. Arbitrator's Finding of Repudiation by Purchaser and Direction for Refund of Consideration under MAPA Considered.

The dispute arose from a Master Asset Purchase Agreement (MAPA) dated 31st March 2005 between Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt. Ltd. as purchaser and V Hote...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Appeal Against Order Rejecting Impleadment in Suit for Specific Performance. Appellants Sought to Be Added as Co-Plaintiffs, Citing Interest in Property and Necessity for Complete Adjudication.

This appeal arose from the order of a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court rejecting Chamber Summons No.1334/2004, by which the appellants so...