Search Results for "Major Port Trusts Act, 1963"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Major Port Trusts Act, 1963"

57 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 57 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated by Chairman Without Authority Under Major Port Trusts Act, 1963. Chairman of Mumbai Port Trust lacked jurisdiction to issue charge sheets as the power to initiate disciplinary proceedings vests with the Board of Trustees under Section 28 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963.

1 Dec 2022

The petitioner, Suruchi Rajendra Gurjar, was the Chief Law Officer (under suspension) of Mumbai Port Trust (MPT). She challenged five disciplinary pro...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case by Restoring Arbitral Award. High Court's Setting Aside of Award Under Section 37(1)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Found Erroneous as It Exceeded Scope of Judicial Review.

28 Jul 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard a civil appeal arising from a dispute between PSA Sical Terminals Pvt. Ltd., the appellant, and The Board of Trustees...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Port Authority's Appeal in Admiralty Suit Over Port Dues and Anchorage Charges. Auction purchaser liable for port dues and anchorage charges for period vessel remained in port after delivery, as per Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 and scale of rates.

12 Feb 2021

The case involves a commercial appeal filed by the Board of Trustees of the Port of Mumbai (MbPT) against an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Port Trust to Seize and Dispose of Third-Party Goods Under Section 6 of Public Premises Act. The Court held that Section 6 of the PP Act is independent of the Major Port Trusts Act and permits disposal of goods found on public premises even if they belong to third parties without privity of contract.

21 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court considered appeals arising from a Full Bench reference of the Calcutta High Court concerning the interpretation of Section 6 of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Tenant in Public Premises Act Case, Holding Pophale Protection Applies Despite Premises Belonging to Local Authority. Premises Owned by Port Trust, Though Exempt from Rent Control, Still Fall Within Supreme Court's Ruling That Pre-1971 Occupants Cannot Be Evicted Under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971.

3 May 2018

The writ petition arose from an eviction proceeding under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971. The petitioner, Board of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Notification Excluding Port Trust Employees from Minimum Wages Act Provisions. The notification dated 15/03/2002 exempting employees from Section 2(h), Section 14 of Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and Rule 25 of Minimum Wages (Central) Rules, 1950 was held ultra vires as not issued by appropriate government.

6 Jul 2017

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Mumbai Port Trust Flotilla Worker's Association and Mumbai Port Trust, Dock and General Employees' U...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Disqualification from Tender for Violation of Non-Compete Clause. Clause 8.31 of Licence Agreement Between GTI and JNPT Prohibited Promoters from Bidding for Competing Projects, and Subsequent Government Policy Could Not Be Read into Existing Contract.

10 Mar 2010

The petitioner, APM Terminals B.V., a Dutch company, along with Container Corporation of India Ltd (CONCOR), formed a joint venture company called Gat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Port Trust's Claim for Demurrage Prior to Confiscation Order: Suit Not Barred by Limitation. Right to Sue Accrues on Date of Confiscation Under Article 113, Limitation Act, 1963, and Not at Expiry of Free Days Despite Board's Powers Under Sections 61 and 62 of Major Port Trusts Act, 1963.

15 Dec 2006

This is a suit filed by the Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay against an importer for recovery of port trust charges (wharfage and demurrage) ac...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appointment of Chief Medical Officer in Port Trust. Selection and appointment of respondent no.3 as Chief Medical Officer with Mormugao Port Trust upheld as valid under the Recruitment Regulations, 2000.

5 Apr 2006

The petitioner, Dr. Dnyaneshwer Purshottam Kudalkar, a Chief Medical Officer with New Mangalore Port Trust, challenged the selection and appointment o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Steamer Agent's Challenge to Port Trust's Demurrage Claim — Agent Held Liable for Unpaid Port Dues Despite Acting for Foreign Principal. The court affirmed that a steamer agent is personally liable for port charges when the principal is a foreign entity not amenable to Indian jurisdiction.

16 Dec 2005

The petitioner, Forbes Forbes Campbell & Co. Ltd., was the steamer agent for American President Lines Ltd., a foreign shipping company. Seven cartons ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)