Search Results for "Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958"

180 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 180 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Panchayat No Confidence Motion Case Due to Invalid Membership Based on Caste Certificate Non-Compliance. Member's Failure to Submit Validity Certificate Within Mandatory Period Under Section 10-1A of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 Results in Retrospective Termination of Election, Making No Confidence Motion Valid.

21 Apr 2025

The dispute centered on the validity of a No Confidence Motion against the Sarpanch of Jambulani Gram Panchayat, which hinged on whether Appellant No....

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Challenge to No Confidence Motion in Gram Panchayat Dispute. Petitioner's removal upheld as meeting complied with procedural requirements under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Rules.

21 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Manoj Ghanshyamdas Banode, was the elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Talegaon Dashasar. On 05.12.2016, a no confidence motion was pas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Deletion of Names from Electoral Rolls After Elections Held. Election Results Cannot Be Set Aside Without Proving Material Effect Under Section 12 of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958.

25 Sep 2018

The petitioners, Avantika Ramesh Lekurwale and Atul Ramdas Balbudhe, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Members Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. Allegations of Encroachment on Government Land Led to Disqualification Under Section 14(1)(j-3); Petitioners Argued Encroachments Were by Spouses, Not Themselves.

24 Feb 2018

The petitioners were elected members of Gram Panchayat Kalamb, with petitioner no.1 elected as Sarpanch. Respondent nos.5 and 6 filed a complaint on 5...

High Court

Bombay High Court Addresses Conflicting Precedents on Procedural Mandates for No Confidence Motions Under Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Reference to Larger Bench Examines Whether Formal Motion and Seconding Requirement Under Rule 17 of Meeting Rules is Mandatory or Directory.

9 Oct 2014

The appeal before the Bombay High Court arose from a no confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Theur, Pune. The appellant, wh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Village Panchayat Member for Being Servant of Agricultural Produce Market Committee. Agricultural Produce Market Committee Held to be a Local Authority Under Section 14(1)(i) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958, and Section 3(31) of General Clauses Act, 1897.

22 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Babasaheb Devram Sathe, was elected as a member of the Gram Panchayat, Jalgaon Budruk, in 2010 and also functioned as Sarpanch. The fi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Meeting Rules Apply to No Confidence Motion Meetings Under Section 35 of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958; No Fresh Meeting Can Be Convened After Expiry of Seven Days on Basis of Illegal Motion. The court ruled that Rule 17 of the Meeting Rules applies to no confidence meetings and that under Section 35(3-B), no direction can be given for a fresh meeting after seven days on an illegal motion.

21 Apr 2011

The Bombay High Court addressed two questions of law referred to it concerning the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. The first question was whether...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Inclusion of Families in Village Panchayat Ward Formation. Inclusion of 18 families from Village Revadi into Village Tambi for ward formation upheld as valid exercise of power under Section 4(2) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Article 243(g) of Constitution.

1 Sep 2010

The petitioners, Jadhav Shankar Dyandeo and Sapkal Sampat Bhau, were project-affected persons rehabilitated in Village Revadi. They sought formation o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Inclusion of Villages in Scheduled Areas Under Maharashtra Scheduled Tribes (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Certificate Rules, 2003. Court holds that the State Government's notification including villages in scheduled areas is valid and not subject to challenge in writ petitions.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by Grampanchayats and individuals challenging the inclusion of their villages in scheduled areas unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Gram Panchayat Elections — Upholds Validity of Election Process Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. Court holds that election of members of Gram Panchayat cannot be challenged after declaration of results except by an election petition under Section 15 of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to two Letters Patent Appeals (LPA No.203 of 2011 and LPA No.204 of 2011) filed against the orders of a learned Single Judge of ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)