Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966"

675 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 675 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Petition Challenging Draft Development Plan Publication and Extension Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Petitioners Allege Irregularities in Municipal Corporation's Substitution of Plan and Ex Post Facto Extension Under Section 26.

5 Aug 2016

The matter pertains to a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the notification dated 04.02.2016 published under S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Notification under Section 20(4) of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Court Holds No Additional Hearing Required After Considering Objections; Acquisition Proceedings Challenge Not Concluded.

3 Jul 2012

The petitioners, owners of Gat No. 264 in Village Varsoli, Pune, challenged two actions by the State and Lonavala Municipal Council. The adjoining Gat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Change of Land Use from Park to Commercial in Public Interest Litigation. Notification under Section 37 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 set aside as land reserved for park cannot be diverted to commercial use without following proper procedure and public hearing.

19 Oct 2006

The petitioner, Sangharsh Kruti Samiti, a public interest organization, filed a writ petition challenging a notification dated 30.1.2003 issued by the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Issuance of Occupation Certificate for Committed Development Under UDCPR Regulation 5.1.3. Development Permission Granted Before Draft Regional Plan Publication Protects Builder's Right to Occupation Certificate Despite Subsequent Agricultural Reservation in Regional Plan.

9 Dec 2024

The petitioner, Raj Realtors, a partnership firm, constructed ten buildings comprising 446 residential and 20 commercial units on land at Mouje Pashan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Development Charge Levy in Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act. The court held that the levy is a fee for services rendered and not a tax, and the amendment is within legislative competence.

13 Jun 2005

The petitioners, The Solapur Promoters and Builders Association Society and another, challenged the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Regiona...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Corrigendum to Final Development Plan. Corrigendum Restoring Botanical Garden Reservation Upheld as Permissible Rectification of Error Without Fresh Notification Under MRTP Act.

17 Apr 2006

The petitioner, Housilal Balchand Shah, owned land in survey no. 34 at Anand Valli, Nasik. In the draft development plan under the Maharashtra Regiona...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landowners’ Writ Petitions Challenging Refusal to Grant Development Permission Based on Non-Issuance of Gazette Notification Under Section 127(2) of MRTP Act, 1966. Court Holds That Lapsing of Reservation Declared by Court Under Section 127(1) Takes Immediate Effect and Development Rights Are Not Dependent on Subsequent Notification.

3 Jul 2013

The case involved five writ petitions filed by different landowners whose lands were originally reserved under the Development Plan of Amravati for va...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking TDR for Land Acquired Under MRTP Act — Transferable Development Rights Claim Barred by Limitation as Application Filed Beyond Reasonable Period After Possession. The court held that a claim for TDR under Section 126(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 must be made within a reasonable period, and a delay of seven years from the date of possession disentitles the claimant.

10 Sep 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Karan Developers, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Pune Municipal Corporati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Regularization of Unauthorized Buildings in Navi Mumbai — Section 52A MRTP Act Does Not Apply to Lands Acquired for Public Purpose and Belonging to Planning Authority. The court held that the compounding provision under Section 52A of the MRTP Act, 1966 is not applicable to unauthorized constructions on lands acquired for public purpose and vested in the Planning Authority.

14 Aug 2018

The petitioners were residents of buildings constructed without development permission on lands acquired by the State Government for the satellite cit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Removal of Land Reservation for Architects' Association. State's Power to Modify Development Plan Under Section 31 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Upheld.

23 Jun 2006

The petitioner, Indian Institute of Architects, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, filed a writ petition under Article 2...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)