Search Results for "Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975"

23 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 23 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forest Notification and Collector's Order Under Maharashtra Private Forest Act. Land Declared as Forest in 1960 Notification Cannot Be Challenged After Decades; Collector's Suo Motu Order Under Section 22(5) Upheld.

The petitioners, claiming to be owners of land in Survey No.245/4B, Kavesar, Thane, challenged an order dated 27 March 2015 passed suo motu by the Dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Vesting of Land as Private Forest Under Maharashtra Private Forest (Acquisition) Act, 1975. Defective Notice Under Section 35(3) and Notification Under Section 35(1) Render Vesting Invalid.

The petitioner, Rajmachi Rural Aid and Development Programme, a trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, filed a writ petition challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner in Private Forest Vesting Case — Land Classified as Private Forest Under Section 2(c-i)(f) of Maharashtra Private Forest (Acquisition) Act, 1975 Vests in State; No Evidence of Cultivation Produced.

The petitioner, Gaurakshan Sanstha, a public trust established in 1962 for Panjarpole purposes, owned agricultural land in various villages. In 1985, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Record — Violation of Natural Justice. Mutation entries made without notice to the petitioner were quashed and matter remanded for fresh consideration after hearing.

The petitioner, Ozone Land Agro Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Against MRT Order in Forest Land Dispute — Failure to Implead Necessary Parties and Lack of Evidence of Government Ownership Leads to Dismissal.

The State of Maharashtra and the Deputy Conservator of Forests, Alibag, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Award for Failure to Prove Ownership. Petitioner's claim of title based on a 1962 sale deed was unsupported by documentary evidence, leading to dismissal of writ petition.

The petitioner, Sayed Mohamed Shah Abdul Hamid Kadri, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Tribunal's Order to Reinstate IFS Officer in Disciplinary Proceedings. Court holds that charges of misconduct were not established and that the disciplinary authority's order was based on no evidence.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the State of Maharashtra and others challenging the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (MRT) ...