Search Results for "Maharashtra Forest Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Forest Rules"

420 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 420 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act Provisions for Election Disqualification of Directors for Default in Loan Repayment. The Court held that Section 73AB and 73B of the MCS Act, 1960, which disqualify directors for default in repayment of loans, are not ultra vires the Constitution and are reasonable restrictions under Article 19(1)(g) and Article 14.

31 Dec 2025

The case involves a batch of civil appeals challenging the constitutional validity of Sections 73AB and 73B of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Maharashtra Revenue Services (Recruitment) Rules, 2020 and Directs Finalization of Seniority Lists for Deputy Collectors — Seniority to be Determined by Date of Continuous Officiation, Not by Date of Regular Promotion.

8 Aug 2024

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by Deputy Collectors and the State of Maharashtra concerning the determination of seniority o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

23 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Wildlife Offence Case Based on Confessional Statements and Recoveries. Confessional statements made to forest officers under Section 50 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 are admissible and sufficient for conviction when corroborated by recovery of wild animal meat and weapons.

5 Oct 2023

The case pertains to a criminal revision application filed by five accused (Nos. 8, 9, 10, 11, and 13) challenging their conviction and sentence under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Wildlife Offence Case — Confessional Statements and Seizures Held Admissible Under Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. The court dismissed the revision application challenging the conviction under Sections 9, 27, 29, 31 read with Section 51(1) of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 for hunting Chitals in Nagzira Forest.

5 Oct 2023

The judgment arises from a criminal revision application filed by five accused (original accused Nos. 8, 9, 10, 11, and 13) challenging their convicti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Bans Mining in Eco-Sensitive Zones Around National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries. Minimum 1 km Buffer Zone Mandated to Protect Forest Resources and Wildlife Habitat Under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

3 Jun 2022

This judgment arises from a series of interlocutory applications in the ongoing T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India public interest litigati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Mining Dispute — Quashes Forest Officer's Stop Order for Lack of Jurisdiction. License Under Maharashtra Minerals Rules Valid for Transport of Bauxite from Non-Forest Land, No Prior Approval Under Forest (Conservation) Act Required.

28 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Dharti Industries Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in mining and processing of minerals, challenged a communication dated 19.12.2017 issue...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Writ Petition Maintainable Against Sessions Judge's Order Under Indian Forest Act, 1927 Despite Finality Clause. Finality Clause Under Section 61G Does Not Bar Constitutional Remedy Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

9 Jan 2018

The petitioner, Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited (FDCM), filed a criminal writ petition challenging an order dated 01/08/2017 pas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Rejection of Forest Rights Claim Under Forest Rights Act, 2006 — Remands for Fresh Consideration Due to Non-Application of Mind. The impugned order was cryptic and did not record any reasons for rejection, violating the requirement of a speaking order under the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006.

10 Apr 2017

The petitioner, Lalba Nana Bethekar, claiming to be a member of the Korku Scheduled Tribe, filed an application under Section 3 of the Scheduled Tribe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Forest Rights Claim Under Forest Rights Act, 2006. Cryptic Order Without Reasons Set Aside, Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration of Application by Korku Tribe Member.

10 Apr 2017

The petitioner, Lalba Nana Bethekar, claiming to be a member of the Korku Scheduled Tribe, filed an application under Section 3 of the Scheduled Tribe...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)