Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Rules"

79 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 79 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

23 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Election of Agriculture Produce Market Committee Due to Non-Compliance with Reservation Rules. Court holds that failure to provide reservation for Scheduled Tribes in the office of Chairperson as per Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 and Rules renders the election process invalid.

6 May 2019

The petitioners, eleven agriculturists from Bhandara district, filed a writ petition challenging the election of the Agriculture Produce Market Commit...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Britannia Industries Ltd. Against Bombay Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Regarding Applicability of APMC Act to Processed Products. Court Holds That Sugar, Edible Oil, and Vanaspati Are 'Agricultural Produce' Under Section 2(1)(a) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963, and Market Fees Can Only Be Levied on Transactions Within the Market Area.

24 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by Britannia Industries Ltd. challenging the applicability of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Supersession of Agricultural Produce Market Committee for Violation of Natural Justice. Order of Supersession Under Section 14(1) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Show Cause Notice Requirement.

14 Jan 2019

The petitioners, who were members of the Umrane Agricultural Produce Market Committee, challenged the order of supersession of the committee passed by...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Merger Notification of APMC Devadurga with APMC Raichur for Violation of Natural Justice. Notification under Section 5(1) of Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966 set aside as no opportunity of hearing was given to affected parties.

20 Sep 2017

The petitioners, including individual residents and a cotton merchants association, challenged a notification dated 27.04.2017 issued by the State of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Market Fee on Copra as Not Notified Agricultural Produce Under APMC Act. Explanation to Rule 32(1) of Goa APMC Rules Held Ultra Vires as Copra Not in Schedule to Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963.

22 Jul 2016

The petitioners, Marico Industries Ltd. and Jude Linhares, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the demand for market...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Market Fee Levy on Tobacco Products Under APMC Act — Tobacco Products Held Not Exempt as 'Manufactured Product' Under Section 2(1)(a) of Bombay Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1939. Processing of tobacco into chewing tobacco or gutka does not transform it into a manufactured product; market fee is leviable.

24 Apr 2006

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by companies and their shareholders challenging the levy of market fee on tobacco products under the Bo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Maharashtra Act XI of 2003 Amending the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963. The Court Held That the Amendment Disenfranchising Certain Elected Members of Market Committees Was Within Legislative Competence and Did Not Violate Articles 14 or 19(1)(c) of the Constitution.

13 Feb 2006

The Bombay High Court, by a common judgment, dismissed two writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Act XI of 2003, w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Agricultural Societies Challenging Licence Cancellation Under Maharashtra APMC Act. Societies Failed to Establish Market Yard Despite Show-Cause Notice and Opportunity of Hearing.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, fourteen agricultural produce societies, filed a writ petition challenging the cancellation of their licences under the Maharashtra A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Directing Re-election of APMC Newasa and Bhusawal — Model Code of Conduct Cannot Override Statutory Provisions of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963. Minister's Order Violated Principles of Natural Justice and Was Without Jurisdiction as Election Process Had Already Commenced Under Section 14 of the Act.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging orders of the Minister for Cooperation, Marketing and Textile Department, Maharashtra, directing ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)