Search Results for "Madhya Pradesh Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Rules"

31 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 31 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Para-Teachers Seeking Regularisation in Jharkhand. Contractual Engagement Under Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan Does Not Confer Right to Absorption or Pay Parity with Regular Teachers.

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of civil appeals filed by para-teachers engaged under the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) in Jharkhand, challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Employer's Appeals in Industrial Dispute Over Transfer Orders. Transfer Orders Declared Illegal for Violating Section 9A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 as They Constituted Illegal Change Without Notice and Altered Work Nature.

The dispute arose from transfer orders dated 13.01.2015 issued by Caparo Engineering India Ltd., the employer, transferring nine workmen from its Dewa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation Over Reinstatement for Daily Wage Employee in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Refusal of reinstatement and back wages upheld as employee worked only for 4 years and compensation of Rs. 25,000 deemed adequate under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Jagdish s/o Karuji Bombarde, was a daily wage employee of the Municipal Council, Tumsar. He was appointed in February 1997, transferre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Labour Commissioner's Order Under Section 33C(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Recovery Certificate for Backwages Upheld Despite Bank's Claim of Limitation and Set-Off

The petitioner, The Goa Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd., challenged an order dated 24/03/2017 passed by the Labour Commissioner under Section 33C(1) of t...