Search Results for "Madhya Pradesh Arbitration Tribunal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Madhya Pradesh Arbitration Tribunal"

161 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 161 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitration Award in Partnership Dispute — Upholds Validity of Award Based on Partnership Deed and Evidence. Court Held That Arbitrator's Findings on Dissolution and Accounts Were Not Perverse and Did Not Warrant Interference Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

10 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Vinod Kumar Saraf, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award date...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka hears civil miscellaneous petition seeking termination of existing arbitral tribunal and appointment of independent sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The dispute arises from a works contract where the contractor sought replacement of the arbitrator appointed by the department on grounds of bias and non-compliance with disclosure requirements.

11 Aug 2022

The petitioner, a contractor, was awarded a works contract by the Central Public Works Department (CPWD) for construction of a Sewage Treatment Plant....

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award on Termination and Repudiation of Master Asset Purchase Agreement. Arbitrator's Finding of Repudiation by Purchaser and Direction for Refund of Consideration under MAPA Considered.

10 May 2013

The dispute arose from a Master Asset Purchase Agreement (MAPA) dated 31st March 2005 between Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt. Ltd. as purchaser and V Hote...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Maritime Board Dispute Over Cargo Handling Charges. Court sets aside majority award directing payment at Rs.3 per metric tonne, remits matter for fresh consideration on applicability of 1995 or 1996 policy.

22 Jun 2017

The Maharashtra Maritime Board (Claimant) filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging a m...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — Compensation for Delay Upheld. Majority Award on Claim for Losses Due to Delay Not Perverse or Contrary to Contract Terms Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

6 Dec 2022

The State of Maharashtra, through the Chief Engineer (Special Projects), Public Works Department, and the Executive Engineer, filed a petition under S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Share Purchase Dispute — Upholds Majority Award on Misrepresentation of Receivables. The court held that the arbitral tribunal's findings on misrepresentation and damages were not perverse and did not warrant interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Mar 2012

The petitioner, GWL Properties Ltd. (formerly Gordon Woodroffe Ltd.), challenged a majority arbitral award dated 31 August 2009 under Section 34 of th...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition under Section 34 of Arbitration Act and Confirms Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute; Appeal Under Section 37 Arises. Single Judge's Order Upholds Award Holding Breach of Contract by Not Supplying DTC Lists

19 Oct 2013

The appeal under section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB)/Maharashtra State El...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Contractual Dispute — Constitution of Arbitral Tribunal Upheld Despite Appointment of Third Arbitrator by Appointing Authority. The court held that the appointment of a third arbitrator under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, without party consultation, is valid when one party fails to appoint its arbitrator, and the award on merits, including interest at 18% per annum, is not against public policy.

14 Sep 2010

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a judgment of the District Judge, Pune, which ...

High Court

High Court Hears Petitions Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Against Awards Passed Under Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act in Loan Recovery Matter. Bank's Claim for Defaulted Loan Allowed by Arbitrator After Cooperative Court Returned Plaint for Want of Jurisdiction Following Conversion to Multi-State Bank.

2 Apr 2013

The judgment (or portion thereof) involves four arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challengin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds That Jurisdiction for Section 34 Challenge to MSMED Act Award Is Governed by Section 18(4) of MSMED Act, Not by Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Agreement. The non obstante provision in Section 18(4) overrides the arbitration agreement, and the Section 34 petition must be filed at the place where the supplier is located.

16 Oct 2024

The case involves a reference to a Larger Bench of the Bombay High Court to resolve a conflict between two Single Judge decisions regarding the jurisd...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)