Search Results for "MRTU and PULP Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "MRTU and PULP Act"

524 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 524 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition and Dismisses Union's Petition in Industrial Dispute Over Recognition of Union. Industrial Court's interim order directing recognition of union as sole bargaining agent set aside as beyond jurisdiction under Section 30(2) of MRTU & PULP Act.

19 Dec 2025

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed in the Bombay High Court challenging an interim order passed by the Industrial Court, Mumbai, under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Caste Validity Certificates — Employer Lacks Locus Standi Under Maharashtra Caste Certificate Act, 2000. Corporation Cannot Challenge Certificates Issued to Employees as Only Person Aggrieved or State Government Can Do So.

20 Aug 2024

The Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation (PCMC) filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the caste validity certificates issue...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Territorial Jurisdiction in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint Filed by Union for Employee Posted Outside Maharashtra. The Court held that the Industrial Court under MRTU & PULP Act has jurisdiction if the employer's establishment is within Maharashtra, even if the employee works outside the state.

22 Mar 2024

The Petitioner, M/s. Abbott India Ltd., a pharmaceutical company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, and its officer Mr. Jitendra Wadhw...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows CIDCO's Petition, Quashes Industrial Court Order Directing Permanent Employment of Contractual Employee. Contractual Appointment with Breaks Does Not Automatically Confer Right to Permanency Under MRTU & PULP Act.

5 Oct 2023

The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition filed by City Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. (CIDCO) challenging an order of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Industrial Court's Order Setting Aside Preliminary Issue Framing in Employee Status Dispute. The Industrial Court Correctly Held That the Question of Whether an Employee is an 'Employee' Under the MRTU & PULP Act Cannot Be Decided as a Preliminary Issue as It Involves Mixed Questions of Fact and Law.

10 Oct 2022

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (employer), challenged the judgment and order dated November 13, 2021 passed b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Revision Petition Under MRTU & PULP Act — Industrial Court Has Power to Permit Amendment. The Court held that the Industrial Court exercising revisional jurisdiction under Section 44 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 has the power to permit amendment of the memo of revision petition, as the power to allow amendment is inherent in the exercise of revisional jurisdiction.

5 May 2022

The petitioners, Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Technical and Educational Society and another, challenged an order dated 16/09/2019 passed by the Industr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Employees in Industrial Dispute Against Electricity Company — Reinstatement with Back Wages Upheld. The Court held that the Industrial Court's order of reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages was justified as the termination of the employees was illegal and in violation of the principles of natural justice.

10 Nov 2017

The case involves an appeal by employees against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, which had set aside the order of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Unfair Labour Practice Case, Holding Unrecognised Union Cannot Maintain Complaint Under MRTU & PULP Act. The court ruled that only a recognised union has locus standi to file a complaint under Section 28 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 for items 5 and 9 of Schedule IV.

18 Dec 2015

The case involves an appeal by Ballarpur Industries Limited (appellant) against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, which...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Employee in Forest Development Corporation Case — Termination Without Domestic Inquiry Invalid Under MRTU & PULP Act. Employer's failure to conduct proper inquiry and denial of opportunity to lead evidence renders termination illegal, warranting reinstatement with back wages.

27 Sep 2011

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited (FDCM) challenging the orders of the Labour Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Industrial Court Order on Permanency and Back Wages in Newspaper Industry Dispute. Industrial Court's finding that previous litigation had determined entitlement to permanency and back wages was upheld, but the High Court held that the Industrial Court had no jurisdiction to grant permanency under the MRTU Act.

12 Mar 2010

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by employees (Sanjay Shalikram Ingle and others) against M/s. Lokmat Newspapers Private Ltd., chal...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)