Search Results for "MRTU & PULP Act, 1971"

518 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 518 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Management's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Suspension and Deduction Upheld. Disciplinary action and voluntary deduction under settlement were valid, not constituting unfair labour practice under Items 9 and 10 of Schedule IV of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Vivekanand Rugnalaya, Latur, a hospital management, challenged the judgment and order dated 13/11/2013 of the Industrial Court, Latur,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MPSRTC's Challenge to Industrial Court Order on Special Allowance Ceiling. Unilateral Reduction of Special Allowance from 5% to 2.5% of Basic Pay Held as Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Madhya Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (MPSRTC), challenged the orders dated 19th and 21st March 1996 passed by the Industria...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retirement of Operatives Under Wrong Standing Orders — MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court directed to decide whether petitioners are Operatives governed by Standing Order 20-A or non-operatives under Model Standing Orders.

The petitioners, three employees of M/s Kohinoor Mills (a unit of NTC Ltd.), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Examining the scope of Industrial Court’s jurisdiction in unfair labor practice complaints under MRTU & PULP Act in the context of employer-employee relationships.

Acts and Sections Discussed: Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices (MRTU & PULP) Act, 1971 - Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Maintainability of Individual Workmen's Complaints for Permanency Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court Dismissed Complaints Holding Recognised Union Had Exclusive Right to File Such Complaints, and High Court Finds Need for Factual Adjudication on Merits.

The writ petitions arose from a common judgment of the Industrial Court, Pune, dated 13-3-1996, which dismissed 63 workmen's complaints seeking perman...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Against Industrial Court Order Dismissing Revision as Time-Barred. Limitation for Revision Under Section 44 of MRTU & PULP Act is Governed by Article 137 of Limitation Act, Not Article 113.

The petitioners, employees of the Irrigation Project, Ratnagiri, were appointed as River Gauge Readers and Rain Gauge Readers and worked from 1979 to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions of Sweepers Challenging Termination Without Inquiry. Termination of daily-wage sweepers by Municipal Council set aside for violation of Model Standing Orders and principles of natural justice.

The petitioners, Ram Pyarelal Khicher and Sunita Raju Paisadeli, were employed as sweepers by the Municipal Council, Ramtek. Ram was appointed on 8.12...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Holding Retrenchment as Unfair Labour Practice. Non-compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act renders retrenchment illegal and amounts to unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Shekoba Auto Private Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, was engaged in the manufacture of automobile ignition...