Search Results for "MPDA Act, 1981"

248 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 248 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Act Case — Failure to Distinguish Between Law and Order and Public Order. Detention under Section 3 of MPDA Act set aside as grounds related to bootlegging did not affect public order, only law and order.

The petitioner, Badal s/o Manoj Sahare, challenged the detention order dated 26/04/2023 passed by the District Magistrate, Wardha under Section 3(1) a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Invalid Delegation of Powers. Delegation Order Under Section 3(2) Must Record Satisfaction Based on Material and Reasons; Absence Renders Delegation and Subsequent Detention Orders Invalid.

The petitioner, Alakshit Rajesh Ambade, challenged the legality of a preventive detention order dated 02.07.2022 passed by the Commissioner of Police,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Material to Support Apprehension of Bail. Detenu in Judicial Custody Without Bail Application; Detaining Authority's Satisfaction of Imminent Release Held Unsubstantiated.

The petitioner, Sagar Sunil Gaikwad, challenged an order of detention dated 27 September 2017 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Supply of Vital Documents — Failure to Furnish In-Camera Statements and Documents Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 8 of MPDA Act.

The petitioner, Hanuman Rajaram Mhatre, was detained under an order dated 6th September 2017 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Thane, under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Execution. The Court Held That a 19-Day Gap Between Passing and Service of Detention Order Without Explanation Violates the Detenu's Right to Make a Representation Under Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Vishnu @ Bablu Vasant Gawali, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-Of...