Search Results for "Lokayukta"

112 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 112 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lokayukta Proceedings Initiated Without Jurisdiction in Writ Petition Under Articles 226 and 227. Upa-Lokayukta lacked authority to act on private complaint without government reference under Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984.

The petitioner, Sri M.V. Srinivasa Gowda, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Tribunal Order Quashing Lokayukta Investigation Against Employee on Deputation. Lokayukta Lacks Jurisdiction Over Local Authority Employees Without Notification Under Section 2(12) of Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984.

The State of Karnataka and its Principal Secretary filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Unreliable Trap Proceedings. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, G B Jagadeesh, was convicted by the Special Judge, Davanagere, in Spl.C.(Lokayukta) No.9/2007 for offences under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Uncorroborated Trap Proceedings. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, M.C. Manjunatha, was convicted by the Principal Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Mysore, in Special Case No. 69/2004 for offences puni...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions of Government Officers Challenging Lokayukta Report for Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to Grant Hearing Under Section 10 of Maharashtra Lokayukta Act, 1971 Renders Report Unsustainable.

The petitioners, officers of the Government of Maharashtra, challenged the report/recommendation of the Hon'ble Lokayukta dated 26 September 2011 in c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Lokayukta Report for Violation of Natural Justice — Failure to Grant Hearing Before Adverse Recommendations Against Government Officers. Section 10 of Maharashtra Lokayukta and Upa-Lokayuktas Act, 1971 Requires Opportunity of Hearing Before Making Report.

The petitioners, officers of the Government of Maharashtra, challenged the report/recommendation of the Hon'ble Lokayukta dated 26 September 2011 and ...