Search Results for "Loan recovery"

1052 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1052 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal to Enforce English Summary Judgment in Guarantee Dispute — Foreign Judgment Held Unenforceable for Violating Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 13 CPC. Summary judgment passed after denying leave to defend is not conclusive and cannot be enforced in India.

The dispute arose from a Share Purchase and Co-operation Agreement (SPCA) executed on 12.05.1995 between (appellant, a foreign company) and (responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Guarantors in SFC Act Recovery Case — Directors Held Jointly and Severally Liable for Company Loan. Guarantors Cannot Raise Defences of Principal Debtor Under Section 31(1)(aa) of State Financial Corporation Act, 1951.

The appeal arises from a judgment dated 19th September 2007 passed by the learned Adhoc District Judge, Pune, in Miscellaneous Civil Petition No.859 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in NI Act Case — Reverses Acquittal for Dishonour of Cheque Issued for Repayment of Housing Loan. Court Holds That Rebuttable Presumption Under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Stands in Favour of Complainant and Accused Failed to Rebut It.

The appellant, Sami Labs Limited, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent, M.V. Joseph, who...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment in Commercial Suit for Recovery of Loan Amount. Plaintiff entitled to decree for Rs.1.65 Crores with interest as defendant failed to raise a triable issue under Order XXXVII CPC.

The plaintiff, Tradelink Exim (India) Pvt Ltd, filed a Commercial Suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the defendant,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Joint Venture Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of joint venture agreement and rejection of counter claims as not perverse.

The petitioner, Development Corporation of Konkan Limited, a government company, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...