Search Results for "Limitation Act inapplicable"

415 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 415 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Accused's Challenge to Delay Condonation in Appeal Against Acquittal Under Customs Act. High Court's Authority to Condonate Delay Upheld as Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 Applies to Appeals Under Section 378 CrPC Unless Expressly Excluded.

The dispute arose from an appeal against acquittal filed by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute. Court upholds award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or perversity in the arbitrator's findings.

The petitioner, Rajuram Sawaji Purohit, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking to set a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Limitation Dispute Over Alternative Plot Allotment. Concurrent Findings on Time-Barred Declaratory Suit Upheld Under Article 136 of Constitution, Applying Limitation Act 1963 Provisions to Determine Starting Point of Limitation.

The appeal arose from a civil suit filed by the appellants seeking declaratory reliefs regarding ownership of an alternative residential plot allotted...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award on Limitation Grounds. Court Holds That the Arbitrator's Finding on Limitation Was Not Perverse and Did Not Warrant Interference Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeal arises from an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court setting aside an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Written Statement in Commercial Suit, Rejecting Limitation Bar Under Article 137. Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963 Held Inapplicable to Applications for Amendment of Pleadings, Allowing Defendants to Elaborate Existing Defences.

The case involves a Chamber Summons taken out by defendant nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5 in Suit No. 2256 of 1998 pending before the Bombay High Court. The defe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay Application by Municipal Corporation Due to Lack of Sufficient Cause. Delay of 235 Days in Filing Appeal Not Explained with Affidavit or Proper Grounds, Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai filed an application for condonation of delay of 235 days in filing a first appeal against a decision of t...