Search Results for "Lease Premium"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Lease Premium"

376 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 376 result(s)

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petition by Petitioner Challenging Membership Grant Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 -- Lease Conditions and Statutory Amendments Upheld in Favor of Respondents

3 Feb 2026

The petitioner society filed a Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging orders that granted membership to respondent ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Stamp Duty on Renewal of Perpetual Lease Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Levy of stamp duty on renewal of perpetual lease is not manifestly arbitrary or violative of Articles 14 and 300A of the Constitution of India.

14 Oct 2025

The Bombay High Court at Nagpur, through a division bench comprising Justices Anil S. Kilor and Rajnish R. Vyas, dismissed two writ petitions challeng...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of Lease for Delay in Hotel Construction Due to Economic Slowdown and Infrastructure Delays. Extension of Time Granted Without Additional Premium Under Agreement to Lease.

13 Mar 2025

The petitioners, M/s. PVP Star Hotels Private Limited and its director, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Railway Eviction Notice for Non-Compliance with Statutory Requirements. Notice under Section 4 of the Railway Land (Unauthorised Occupation) Act, 1966 must specify the period of occupation and be served on the person in occupation.

2 Jan 2024

The petitioners, Bhupendra Villa Premises Co-operative Society Limited, M/s. Ramesh Builders, and Rajen Harshadlal Sanghvi, filed a writ petition unde...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Preliminary Decree. Court holds that a suit for partition is not barred by limitation when the plaintiff is in joint possession and that a co-owner can alienate only his share, not the entire property.

24 Aug 2023

The case involves a partition suit filed by the appellants (plaintiffs) seeking partition and separate possession of their share in the joint family p...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Decree for Partition and Separate Possession. Court holds that a co-owner in possession of joint family property cannot claim adverse possession against other co-owners unless there is ouster or denial of title.

24 Aug 2023

The case involves a partition suit filed by the respondents (plaintiffs) seeking partition and separate possession of joint family properties. The app...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Premium and Interest Demands for Leasehold Land Conversion in Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's demand for premium and interest under Development Charges Rules and lease terms upheld as valid and not arbitrary.

3 May 2023

The petitioners, Shelton Infrastructure Pvt Ltd, Neelkanth Infratech Co., and M/s. Juhi Habitat Pvt. Ltd., were lessees of plots in Navi Mumbai under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner to Retain Allotment Despite Delay in Payment of Lease Premium — Condonation of Delay Granted. Petitioner's failure to pay installments on time due to COVID-19 pandemic condoned, allotment restored on payment of interest and DPC.

19 Apr 2023

The petitioner, Narayani Trexim Pvt. Ltd., participated in a tender floated by CIDCO for lease of a plot in Sector 18, Vashi, Navi Mumbai. It was the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Lavasa Corporation's Second Appeals Against RERA Orders, Holding That RERA Has No Jurisdiction Over Complaints Filed Before Its Establishment. The Court ruled that the Real Estate Regulatory Authority cannot entertain complaints regarding agreements executed prior to the commencement of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

7 Aug 2018

The judgment involves three second appeals filed by Lavasa Corporation Limited against orders of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) and the A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank of Baroda's Challenge to MMRDA's Demand for Additional Premium for FSI Enhancement in Bandra-Kurla Complex Lease. Lease Agreement Interpretation - Clause 13 of Agreement to Lease Does Not Confer Unilateral Right to Additional FSI Without Payment of Additional Premium as Per MMRDA's Policy.

2 Mar 2010

The petitioners, Bank of Baroda and its Deputy General Manager, filed a writ petition challenging the demand of the Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Devel...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)