Search Results for "Labour Welfare Officer"

534 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 534 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Zilla Parishad in Labour Dispute — Reinstatement with Back Wages Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence of Continuous Service. Workman Failed to Prove 240 Days of Service in a Calendar Year Under Section 25-B of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The appellant, the Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad, Latur, challenged the order of a learned Single Judge dated 22.11.2012 in Writ Petition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Consumer Forum's Order in Favor of Construction Worker in Welfare Scheme Dispute. Token Contribution Under BOCW Act Constitutes Consideration, Making Worker a 'Consumer' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated an appeal concerning whether a construction worker registered under the Building and Other Construction Workers...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Challenging High Court’s Order Dismissing Absorption Claims of Temporary LIC Workers. The Court interprets the compromise reached in earlier SLP and the distinction between absorption and recruitment under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

This group of civil appeals by various employee associations challenged the Delhi High Court's common judgment dismissing their appeals and affirming ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Award Reinstating Daily Wager Cook Without Back Wages. Employer's Failure to Cross-Examine Workman Leads to Acceptance of Unchallenged Affidavit Evidence Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, the District Women and Child Welfare Officer, Beed, challenged the judgment and order dated 08/11/2012 of the Labour Court, Aurangabad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Regularization of Contract Labour as Permanent Workmen. Employer Failed to Prove Genuineness of Contract Labour System, and Concurrent Findings of Fact by Industrial Tribunal and Appellate Authority Were Not Perverse.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Western Coalfields Limited (the employer) under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challengi...