Search Results for "Karnataka VAT Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Karnataka VAT Act"

92 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 92 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Refund of Pre-deposit in VAT Matter — Mandamus Issued for Release of Rs. 16,11,19,226/- and Interest on Delayed Refund. Petitioner entitled to refund of pre-deposit amount with interest under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

16 Jul 2025

The petitioner, M/s. Flipkart India Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus d...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by States of Karnataka and Kerala in Lottery Tax Dispute — State Legislatures Have Competence to Tax Lotteries Under Entry 62 List II. Regulatory Entry 40 List I Does Not Bar State Taxation of Lotteries Organised by Other States.

23 Mar 2022

The Supreme Court considered appeals by the States of Karnataka and Kerala against judgments of their respective High Courts which had struck down sta...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Re-Assessment Orders in KVAT Act Case Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Reasons. Input Tax Credit Denial Based on Non-Availability of Selling Dealers at Registered Address Held Invalid Under Section 10(2) and Section 39 of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003.

17 Jun 2019

The petitioner, M/s Onyx Designs, a proprietorship concern dealing in bags and gift items, was a registered dealer under the Karnataka Value Added Tax...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Appeals in VAT Input Tax Credit Dispute — Reassessment Notices Issued Beyond Limitation Period Are Invalid. The court held that reassessment under Section 39(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 must be completed within four years from the end of the relevant tax period, and notices issued after that period are barred by limitation.

31 Aug 2018

The case involves multiple writ appeals filed by the State of Karnataka against orders of a single judge quashing reassessment notices issued under Se...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in KVAT Penalty Case — Assessee's Goods in Transit Not Liable to Penalty Under Section 53(7) of KVAT Act, 2003. Goods Intercepted While Moving from Pune to Bangalore with Valid Invoice; Penalty Set Aside as No Contravention of Act Established.

5 Feb 2018

The appellant, M/s Jai Hind Ply, a proprietorship concern engaged in the sale of plywood, timber, and related materials, is registered under the Mahar...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Revision Petition in VAT Input Tax Credit Dispute — Remands Matter for Fresh Consideration on Merits. The Assessing Officer's reversal of input tax credit under Section 39(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, was set aside due to lack of proper consideration by the Appellate Tribunal.

22 Jan 2018

The petitioner, Mukand Limited, a registered dealer under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, engaged in the manufacture and sale of steel produc...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Reassessment Order in VAT Case Due to Limitation Bar — Reassessment Order Passed Beyond 5-Year Limitation Under Section 39(1) of KVAT Act, 2003 Cannot Be Sustained Despite Court Direction. Court Directions Cannot Extend Statutory Limitation Period.

9 Oct 2017

The petitioner, M/s. Federal Mogul Goetze (India) Ltd., filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the r...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Against Reassessment Order Under Karnataka VAT Act, 2003 Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy. Court holds that breach of natural justice and jurisdictional error do not warrant interference under Article 226/227 when an effective alternative remedy of appeal under Section 62 of the Karnataka VAT Act, 2003 is available.

29 Jun 2016

The petitioner, Pharpur Cooling Towers Ltd, filed writ petitions under Article 226/227 of the Constitution challenging a reassessment order dated 29.4...

High Court

High Court Allows Writ Appeals Against Reassessment Notice Under KVAT Act Due to Lack of Jurisdiction — Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Under Section 52(1) of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003.

18 Mar 2015

The appellant, M/s Paharpur Cooling Towers Ltd., engaged in construction, supply, erection and commissioning of cooling towers, was issued a notice un...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeals Against Reassessment Notice Under KVAT Act — Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Quashed. Reassessment notice under Section 52(1) of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 for tax periods 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 issued on 09.01.2015 held barred by limitation as four-year period from end of tax period had expired.

18 Mar 2015

The appellant, M/s Paharpur Cooling Towers Ltd., is engaged in the business of construction, supply, erection and commissioning of cooling towers for ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)