Search Results for "Judicial conscience"

1032 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1032 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Disciplinary Authority's Dismissal Order in Service Matter Due to Disproportionate Punishment. Dismissal of Head Clerk with 40 Years Service for Shortfall of Rs.12,900/- in Fine Remittance Violated Proportionality Principle Under Article 226.

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution sought to challenge the dismissal of a Head Clerk from the Judicial Magistrate Court No.II, T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case, Restoring Arbitral Award Set Aside by Single Judge. Limited Judicial Review Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Precludes Re-appreciation of Evidence Unless Award Shocks Conscience or Conflicts with Public Policy.

The dispute arose between Appellant, a foreign company manufacturing biscuits in Zimbabwe, and Respondent, an Indian partnership firm, regarding the s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Railway Protection Force Constable for Gross Neglect of Duty and Abuse of Authority. High Court's Reinstatement Order Set Aside for Exceeding Writ Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence.

The case arose from disciplinary proceedings against Rajendra Kumar Dubey, a Constable in the Railway Protection Force (RPF), who was charged with gro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable for Dual Appointment and Forgery in Jharkhand Police Case. Division Bench Erred in Reappreciating Evidence in Departmental Enquiry Where Charges of Fraud and Unauthorised Absence Were Proved on Preponderance of Probabilities.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi, which allowed the Letters Patent Appeal file...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Civil Appeal in Arbitration Dispute, Restoring Arbitral Award Modified by Lower Courts. Judicial Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is Limited, and Courts Cannot Re-appreciate Evidence or Modify Awards on Merits.

The dispute arose from a construction contract between a civil engineering contractor and the Karnataka State Public Works Department for building off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Magistrate to Order Voice Sample of Accused in Criminal Investigation. Article 20(3) Does Not Bar Compelled Voice Sample as It Is Not Testimonial Evidence Under Section 53 CrPC.

The case arises from an FIR lodged on 7th December 2009 at Sadar Bazar Police Station, Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh, alleging that Dhoom Singh and appell...