Search Results for "Investor Protection"

55 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 55 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs SEBI to Liquidate Sai Group of Companies' Assets to Refund Investors Comprehensive Mandate Issued for Asset Auction and Investor Refund Process

The petitioners, a family of three, have invoked the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution, seeking several di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Stay Application in Arbitration Matter — Consent Order Not Stayed as No Prima Facie Case Made Out. Court held that a consent order passed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be stayed unless fraud or lack of jurisdiction is shown.

The petitioner, Tata Capital Financial Services Limited, a non-banking finance company, had sanctioned an invoice discounting facility of Rs. 20,00,00...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging SEBI's Power to Call Call Data Records. SEBI's Investigative Powers Under Section 11 of SEBI Act, 1992 Include Access to CDRs, and Such Access Does Not Violate Right to Privacy.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the Indian Council of Investors challenging the Securities and Exchange Bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Arbitration Proceedings – Interim Relief – Failure to Issue Shares – Protection of Investment. High Court Granted Interim Relief Protecting Investment of Foreign Investor After Company Failed to Allot Shares Despite Utilizing Funds for Debt Clearance

Misappropriation of investment funds occurs not just by siphoning money but also by enjoying benefits of an investor’s funds without fulfilling corr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Bank's Wilful Defaulter Declaration for Violating Natural Justice. Show-cause notice lacking specific grounds renders the decision invalid under RBI Master Circular on Wilful Defaulters.

The petitioners, Nitin Shah, Rahul Shah, and Kunal Shah, who were directors of Nitin Fire Protection Industries Ltd. (the corporate debtor under CIRP)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Arbitral Award Holding Stockbroker Liable for Unauthorized Trades by Agent. Broker Failed to Prove Client Authorization for Disputed Trades, Resulting in Compensation of Rs.14,37,200/- to Client.

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by IIFL Capital Services Limited (formerly IIFL Secu...