Search Results for "Indian Medicine Central Council Act"

83 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 83 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Council of Architecture's Appeal, Upholds That Section 37 of Architects Act Only Prohibits Use of Title 'Architect'. Government Posts Titled 'Architect' Can Be Held by Unregistered Individuals as the Act Does Not Prohibit Practice of Architecture.

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Allahabad High Court's judgment that Section 37 of the Architects Act, 1972 only prohibits unregister...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SAFEMA Forfeiture Case — Notice to Convict Not Mandatory When Property Held by Relatives. The Court held that proceedings against relatives under Section 6 of SAFEMA are independent and do not require prior notice to the convict.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a Madras High Court judgment that had set aside forfeiture orders under the Smugglers and Foreign Exc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds NEET for AYUSH Courses: Minimum Qualifying Marks Valid Under Section 22 of Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970. All-India Entrance Examination for BAMS, BUMS, BSMS, BHMS and MD-Ayurveda Held Within Regulatory Powers.

The Supreme Court considered appeals and writ petitions challenging the validity of notifications issued by the Central Council of Indian Medicine and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Students to Appear for BAMS Examinations Despite Non-Compliance with Admission Rules. University Directed to Regularize Admissions and Permit Students to Take Exams, Holding That Students Cannot Be Penalized for Faults of Colleges.

The judgment concerns a group of writ petitions filed by students who were admitted to the Bachelor of Ayurvedic Medicine and Surgery (BAMS) course in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Section 13-B of East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 for NRI Landlords in Chandigarh and Punjab. Constitutional validity of provision granting immediate possession to Non-Resident Indians upheld as reasonable classification under Article 14.

The appeals were filed by tenants challenging the constitutional validity of Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, which g...