Search Results for "Gram Panchayat removal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Gram Panchayat removal"

195 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 195 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka examines legality of change of category for Gram Panchayat Adhyaksha election under the Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The principal question concerns the eligibility of a general category elected member to contest a reserved post of Adhyaksha by obtaining a caste certificate after election.

31 Oct 2023

The writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka arose from a dispute concerning the eligibility of a Gram Panchayat member to contest for the pos...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion in Maharashtra Panchayat Raj Act Case — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 9A(2) Notice Requirements. The court held that the notice period of seven clear days must exclude the date of service and the date of meeting, and failure to provide such notice renders the no-confidence motion void.

3 May 2023

The petitioner, Dnyaneshwar Shridhar Matkar, was the Sarpanch of Khirdi Village Panchayat. A notice of no-confidence motion was issued against him und...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Sarpanch for Gross Negligence and Misconduct Under Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act — Appellate Authority's Restoration Order Set Aside. The court held that failure to convene Gram Sabha meetings and misappropriation of funds constituted gross negligence and misconduct under Section 39 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959, and the appellate order was perverse.

10 Feb 2022

The case pertains to the removal of Respondent No.4, Radhakisan Laxman Mhetre, as Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Nalwandi, Beed, under Section 39 of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Directly Elected Sarpanch Challenging Removal by No-Confidence Motion. Court holds that removal of a directly elected Sarpanch must be by Gram Sabha under Section 35(1)(b) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, and not by Gram Panchayat members under Section 55(2).

10 Feb 2022

The petitioner, Jijabai Parasram Aatram, was directly elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Dhamandari, a seat reserved for Scheduled Tribe Woman. On ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Sarpanch Challenging Removal Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — Appellate Order Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind. Minister Failed to Consider Petitioner's Submissions, Violating Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 39(3) of the Act.

7 Feb 2022

The petitioner, Vilas Bhagwat Jagtap, was elected as Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Mudegaon in October 2017. Due to political rivalry, respondent no. ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment on Validity of Delimitation Notifications for Panchayat Constituencies. Petitioners Challenged Increase in Seats and Alleged Non-Compliance with Census Guidelines.

19 Aug 2021

The petitioners, residents and aspiring candidates for Zilla and Taluk Panchayat elections in Karnataka, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Sarpanch Under Section 14(1)(j-3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — No Evidence of Wilful Omission Causing Loss to Gram Panchayat. Disqualification set aside as Collector failed to record finding of loss and appellate authority dismissed appeal without considering merits.

10 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Savita Devidas Adhane, was elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Viramgaon. On 04.08.2018, the District Collector, Aurangabad, disqualifi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal of Gram Panchayat President Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion Invalid as Notice Did Not Comply with Rule 3(2) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Motion of No Confidence Against Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Gram Panchayat) Rules, 1994. The court held that the requirement of specifying the date of meeting in the notice is mandatory, and non-compliance renders the motion void.

8 Feb 2019

The appellant, Smt. Gopemma, was the President of Gram Panchayat Nirna. A notice of no-confidence motion was given by 14 members of the Gram Panchayat...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal of Gram Panchayat President Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion Invalid as Notice Did Not Specify Meeting Date and Time Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the mandatory requirement of specifying date and time in the notice was not complied with, rendering the no-confidence motion invalid.

8 Feb 2019

The appellant, Smt. Gopemma, was the President of Gram Panchayat Nirna. Certain members of the Gram Panchayat issued a notice of no-confidence motion ...

High Court

High Court Quashes Government Resolution Mandating Sarpanch as Ex-officio President of Village Development Committees under Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958. Gram Sabha's exclusive power to constitute Village Development Committees under Section 49 of the Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958, and the prohibition against removal of members before term expiry under Section 49(8) render the impugned Government Resolution invalid.

24 Aug 2010

The judgment of the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, delivered on 24 August 2010, dealt with a batch of eight writ petitions that challenged a Governm...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)