Search Results for "Gram Panchayat members"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Gram Panchayat members"

289 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 289 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Dissolution of Gram Panchayat in Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act Case — Section 145(1-A) Held Directory. Automatic Dissolution on Resignation of More Than 50% Members Set Aside as Remaining Members Can Function Effectively.

19 Dec 2025

The petitioners, three elected members of Gram Panchayat Jawala-Shahapur, challenged the order dated 18.06.2025 passed by the Divisional Commissioner,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Grama Panchayat Delimitation Notification — No Violation of Natural Justice Found in Final Notification Process. Delimitation of Wards Under Section 5 of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 is a Legislative Function Not Requiring Hearing Before Final Notification.

20 Sep 2021

The petitioners, residents of various Grama Panchayats in Mangaluru Taluk, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Ind...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Zilla Parishad Councilor for Office of Profit — Secretary of Watershed Committee Not an Office of Profit Under Section 16(1)(h) of Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961. The court held that the position of Secretary of a Watershed Management Committee with an honorarium of Rs.3,000 per month does not constitute an office of profit under the Act.

31 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Bhagwat Digambarrao Uphad, was elected as a Councilor of the Zilla Parishad. Respondent No.6, Vikram Hanumantrao Uphad, filed an appli...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Up-Sarpanch Election in Gram Panchayat Dispute — No Disqualification Under Section 14(1)(j-3) of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 for Failure to Pay Tax When No Tax Was Imposed.

1 Feb 2019

The case involves a dispute regarding the election of the Up-Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Sukli, District Akola. The petitioners, who are members of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Up-Sarpanch Election Due to Absence of Notice. Court Holds That Presence and Participation of All Members Cures Any Defect in Notice Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

1 Feb 2019

The petitioners, who were members of Gram Panchayat Sukli, challenged the election of respondent no.6 as Up-Sarpanch. The election was held on 23.05.2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Challenge to No Confidence Motion in Gram Panchayat Dispute. Petitioner's removal upheld as meeting complied with procedural requirements under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Rules.

21 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Manoj Ghanshyamdas Banode, was the elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Talegaon Dashasar. On 05.12.2016, a no confidence motion was pas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Gram Panchayat Employee Challenging Dismissal for Indecent Behaviour. Termination Order Upheld as Gram Panchayat Had Power to Dismiss Under Section 61(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Procedure of Natural Justice Was Followed.

29 Jan 2016

The petitioner, Ashok Govindrao Sardar, was appointed as a Water Supply employee of Gram Panchayat Pimpalkhuta on 31 January 1986. On 12 December 2012...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Dissolution of Gram Panchayat Under Section 145(1A) of Maharashtra Gram Panchayat Act, 1958 — Resignations of Members Not Voluntary Due to Coercion. The court held that the Divisional Commissioner failed to verify voluntariness of resignations before dissolving the Gram Panchayat, and the dissolution order was set aside.

9 Jul 2015

The petitioners, Sau. Jyoti Purushhottam Tembhurne (Sarpanch) and Shri Dinesh Hanuman Tembhurne (member), challenged the order dated 22-4-2014 passed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of 50% Reservation for Women in Gram Panchayats — Rule 3(1)(c) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Reservation of Seats for Women) Rules, 1995 Held Intra Vires the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Article 243D of the Constitution.

9 Oct 2014

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Shri Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch in Gram Panchayat Dispute. Court holds that the motion was validly passed by a majority of members and the petitioners failed to establish any procedural irregularity under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a dispute regarding a no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Kasbe Sukene, Taluka Niphad, District Nashi...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)