Search Results for "General Provident Fund"

590 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 590 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows EPFO's Writ Petitions Against Educational Institution and Financial Company for Non-Compliance with Provident Fund Dues. EPF Act Sections 7A and 7B Proceedings Upheld as Proper Exercise of Quasi-Judicial Authority.

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by the Central Board of Trustee, Employees Provident Fund Organization (EPFO) against M/s. Saket Coll...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds EPF Demand Against Regional Rural Bank for Uncovered Employees. Exclusion Under Section 16(1)(c) of EPF Act Not Applicable as Bank's Pension Scheme Did Not Cover All Workers, Following Pawan Hans Precedent.

The dispute arose from a demand by the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation for provident fund contributions amounting to Rs. 10,29,26,330/- against...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Builders' Challenge to Provident Fund Coverage of Casual Construction Workers. Para 26(2) Amendment to Provident Fund Scheme Removes Waiting Period, Requiring Membership from Date of Joining.

Three writ petitions were filed by builders—Sandeep Dwellers Pvt. Ltd., M/s. R.B. Constructions, and Builders Association of India with its members�...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Provident Fund Nomination Dispute — Nominee Entitled to Receive Amount as Trustee for Heirs. Joint Nomination Creates Co-Trusteeship Under Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952.

The appellant, Antonio Joao Fernandes, filed a suit claiming 50% of the provident fund amount of his deceased cousin Joazinho Dias, who had nominated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal by Employer in EPF Act Matter — Statutory Liabilities Cannot Be Waived Without Exemption. Section 7-A Determination Upheld, Holding That Government Scheme Status Does Not Entitle Employer to Leniency in Provident Fund Dues.

The case arose from a writ appeal filed before the Madras High Court against the order of a learned Single Judge dated 31.01.2025 in W.P.No.3608 of 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Clubbing of Establishments Under EPF Act. Common Ownership and Same Telephone Number Justify Clubbing for Coverage Under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

The petitioner, M/s. Kiran Agencies, a proprietary firm engaged in pharmaceutical distribution, challenged the order dated 30.03.2005 passed by the Em...