Search Results for "Forfeiture clause"

479 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 479 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Liquidator's Appeal, Upholds Forfeiture of EMD and PDM for Default by Successful Bidder in Liquidation Sale. Writ Petitioner's Failure to Pay Balance Sale Consideration Within Stipulated Time Justified Forfeiture Under IBC Regulations.

The appellant, Sri Pankaj Srivastava, Liquidator of M/s Samrudhi Realty Ltd., appealed against an order dated 12.12.2024 passed by a learned Single Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Canara Bank's Appeal Against Refund Order in SARFAESI Auction Dispute — Bank Not Obliged to Refund 25% Deposit When Auction Purchaser Defaults on Balance Payment.

The appellant, Canara Bank, conducted an e-auction on 29 November 2021 of a property under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Against Gratuity Award in Favour of Dismissed Employee for Fraudulent School Certificate. Forfeiture of Gratuity Upheld Under Section 4(6)(b)(ii) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 for Misconduct Involving Moral Turpitude.

The petitioner, Western Coalfields Ltd., challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority (Assistant Commissioner, Labour, Chandrapur) dated 21.10.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Extends Time for Payment Under Section 148 CPC Despite Plaintiff's Objection in Consent Decree Default Case. Court holds that Section 148 CPC empowers the court to extend time for payment in a consent decree for reasonable cause, even without the consent of the decree-holder.

The case arises from a Notice of Motion filed by the Defendants (Applicants) to set aside an ex parte decree dated 19 December 2012 in Summary Suit No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Bank's Petition to Forfeit Gratuity of Employee Terminated for Misappropriation. Misappropriation of Funds by Bank Employee Constitutes Offence Involving Moral Turpitude Under Section 4(6)(b)(ii) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Justifying Forfeiture of Entire Gratuity.

The petitioner, Bank of India, challenged the orders of the controlling authority dated 30 June 2004 and the appellate authority dated 4 September 200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Properties under SAFEMA. Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Validly Triggers SAFEMA Proceedings Despite Non-Execution of Detention and Redemption of Confiscated Currency.

The petitioner, Smt. Yamini S. Bhagwanji, challenged the forfeiture of three immovable properties and certain bank accounts under the Smugglers and Fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Forfeiture of Property Under SAFEMA Despite Revocation of Detention Order. Property of Detenu Forfeited Under Sections 7 and 19(1) of SAFEMA Upheld as Detention Order Was Valid When Forfeiture Order Was Passed.

The petitioner, Smt. Padma Nirmal Agarwal, challenged the forfeiture of a flat (Flat No.16, 471/C, Manu Mahal, King's Circle, Mumbai) under the Smuggl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Tenant's Right to Relief Against Forfeiture in Transfer of Property Act Case. Appellate Court Has Jurisdiction to Grant Relief Under Section 114 Even If Tenant Failed to Comply With Trial Court's Conditions.

The dispute arose from a lease of land containing a covenant that in the event of default in payment of rent for two consecutive years, the tenancy ri...