Search Results for "Factories Act, 1948"

156 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 156 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Maharashtra State Handlooms Corporation Against ESI Coverage for Akola Sale Depot. Sale Depot Held to Be a 'Shop' Under Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, Requiring Payment of ESI Contributions.

The appellant, Maharashtra State Handlooms Corporation Limited, challenged the judgment and order dated 18.01.2010 passed by the Industrial Court, Ako...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Proceedings Against Occupier and Manager in Factory Accident Case Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability Allegations. Failure to Allege Specific Role or Knowledge of Contraventions Under Section 37(1) of Factories Act, 1948 Renders Complaint Not Maintainable.

The petitioners, P.P. Upadhya (Director/Occupier) and Konduri Laxminarayan (Manager), sought quashing of proceedings in C.C. No.1220/2012 under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses ESIC Appeal, Holds Hospital Not a Factory Under ESI Act. Pathological laboratory performing diagnostic tests does not constitute a manufacturing process under Section 2(12)(a) of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948.

The case involves an appeal by the Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) against an order of the ESI Court, Nagpur, which set aside a communica...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging ESI Act Applicability to Bidi Manufacturer. Definition of Factory Under Section 2(12) ESI Act Includes Premises with Power-Aided Manufacturing Process, Home Workers Are Employees.

The petitioner, M/s. Ramchand Onkarlal Agarwal, a bidi manufacturer in Kamptee, Nagpur, challenged the applicability of the Employees' State Insurance...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Supervisors' Claim for Overtime Wages Under Factories Act, 1948 — Central Administrative Tribunal Lacks Jurisdiction to Adjudicate Such Claims. Supervisors are not 'workers' under the Factories Act and thus not entitled to overtime under Section 59.

The petitioners, 21 supervisors employed at the India Security Press, Nasik, filed a Writ Petition challenging the order of the Central Administrative...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision Holding Time Keepers as Workers under Factories Act, 1948. The Court Rules That Factual Finding of Nature of Work Being Incidental to Manufacturing Process Is Binding, and the Wide Definition of 'Worker' Covers Clerical Time Keepers.

This appeal before the Supreme Court of India concerns the classification of certain employees as 'workers' under the Factories Act, 1948. The respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in U.P. Shop and Commercial Establishment Act Case Despite Factories Act Argument. Field Workers of Sugar Mill Not Employed in Factory, Thus Covered by Commercial Establishment Definition Under U.P. Act XXII of 1947.

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by special leave against the acquittal of three respondents—the General Manager, Assistant Manager, and S...