Search Results for "FERA appeals"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "FERA appeals"

57 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 57 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers FERA Appeals and Connected Writ Petition Involving Confiscation of Foreign Currency Allegedly Attempted to be Smuggled. The Court Examined Whether the Foreign Currency Was Legally Imported and Declared, and Whether the FERA Tribunal Erred in Setting Aside Confiscation and Penalties.

19 Oct 2010

The matter concerned a seizure of foreign currency totaling US$403,550 (approximately Rs.1.24 crore) from the checked baggage of Ajit Dodia at Mumbai ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Penalty for FERA Violation in Foreign Exchange Remittance Case. Directors and Company Held Liable for Making Payment to Non-Resident Without RBI Permission Under Section 9(1)(a) and 9(1)(d) of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973.

31 Jul 2006

The case involves three appeals filed by Associated Capsules Private Limited and its two directors, Jasjit Singh and Ajit Singh, against an order of t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Penalty on Part-Time Director in FERA Contravention Case Due to Lack of Specific Findings on Responsibility. Liability Under Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 Requires Proof That Director Was in Charge of and Responsible for Conduct of Business at Relevant Time, Not Mere Directorship.

27 Jul 2020

The appeal arose from a penalty imposed on the appellant, a part-time non-executive director of Modi Xerox Ltd., for alleged contravention of the Fore...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955 in Assam Accord Challenge — Majority Holds Cut-off Date of 25.03.1971 for Regularisation of Immigrants Valid. The court held that the provision is a reasonable classification under Article 14 and does not violate Articles 6, 7, 29, 325, 326, 355, 356, or 368 of the Constitution.

17 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions and appeals, considered the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955, which was i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows FERA Appeals Against Penalty for Irregular Release of Foreign Exchange by Full Fledged Money Changer. Show Cause Notice Held Vague for Not Specifying Which RBI Directions Were Violated.

9 Feb 2012

The case involves appeals by Trade Wings Ltd., its managing director V.S. Ubhayakar, and director Kirti T. Shah against an order of the Appellate Trib...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Damages Against Employer in EPF Act Case for Default in Contributions. Levy of Damages Under Section 14B is Consequential Upon Default Without Requirement of Mens Rea for Breach of Civil Obligations.

23 Feb 2022

The appeals arose from a judgment of the High Court of Karnataka, which upheld an order for recovery of damages under Section 14B of the Employees Pro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Admits Writ Petition Filed by Noticee in FEMA Adjudication, Directs Returnable Rule on Issues of Cross-Examination and Joint Proceedings. The petition challenged the Special Director's refusal to permit cross-examination of witnesses and non-supply of co-noticees' replies in proceedings under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999.

30 Jan 2018

Background: The petitioner, a former Vice President of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and Chairman of the Indian Premier League (IPL...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Penalty for FEMA Violations in Bogus Export Case — Appellant Director Held Liable for Receiving Remittances Without Actual Exports Under Sections 3(b) and 3(d) of FEMA.

28 Mar 2012

The case involves an appeal under Section 35 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA) against an order of the Appellate Tribunal for Foreig...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Award Against NAFED in Groundnut Export Dispute — Government Refusal Does Not Excuse Breach Under FOSFA Contract. The court held that a canalizing agency cannot rely on its own lack of permission as a force majeure event under Clause 14 of the FOSFA 20 Contract, and enforcement of the award is not against public policy despite procedural irregularities.

22 Apr 2020

The case involves a dispute between National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India (NAFED), a canalizing agency for the Government of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Division Bench Admitted and Heard Commercial Arbitration Appeal Challenging Single Judge's Refusal to Enforce Three Foreign Arbitral Awards Under Section 50 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Appeal Involves Enforcement Against Non-Signatory Related Companies and Alleged Asset Diversion Through Demerger Schemes to Defeat Execution of ICC London Awards Totaling Over USD 20 Million.

30 Dec 2025

The appeal originated from a dispute between Imax Corporation (appellant) and E-City Entertainment (I) Pvt. Ltd. (first respondent) arising from a Mas...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)