Search Results for "Exclusive Expenditure"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Exclusive Expenditure"

367 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 367 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Assessee's Reference in Income Tax Case on Weighted Deduction, Capital Expenditure, and Revenue Receipt. Interest on Export Packing Credit Not Eligible for Section 35B Deduction; Professional Fees for Cement Project Held Capital Expenditure; Settlement Amount from Swiss Company Treated as Revenue Receipt.

5 Sep 2012

This judgment by the Bombay High Court pertains to an Income Tax Reference under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from an appeal by...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Disallowance Under Section 14A and Capital Expenditure on Bridge Construction. Tribunal's findings that no expenditure was incurred for earning dividend income and that bridge contribution was revenue expenditure upheld.

6 Nov 2020

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Panaji Bench, which had partly a...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Revenue Appeal on Deletion of Additions for Bogus Transportation, Illegal Mining, and Helicopter Expenses. The Court Examines Whether the ITAT's Deletions Were Perverse and Whether Cross-Examination Rights Were Adequately Protected Under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

17 Mar 2023

The appeal before the Karnataka High Court arose from an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bengaluru, which partly allowed the assess...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeals in Income Tax Case on Disallowance of Excess Cane Price Paid by Cooperative Society. Excess Payment Over Statutory Price Under Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 Held Not Deductible as Business Expenditure Under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

5 Mar 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay against the assessee, Tasgaon Taluka Sahakari Sikhar Karkhana Limited, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Part on Mutuality Principle for Effluent Treatment Association. Interest on Bank Deposits Held Taxable as Income from Investments, Not Covered by Mutuality.

17 Jun 2010

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against a decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Revenue's Appeals Against ITAT Decision Favoring Assessee on Deduction of Distributable Surplus Payment to Brand Owner. Court Examines Whether Payment is Allowable Under Section 37 of Income Tax Act, 1961 or Constitutes Application of Income or Diversion by Overriding Title.

25 Sep 2018

The present set of five tax appeals arises under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, filed by the Revenue against the common order of the Incom...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Yum! Restaurants (Marketing) Private Limited in Doctrine of Mutuality Case — Surplus from AMP Activities Held Taxable as Income. Contributions from Non-Beneficiaries and Lack of Complete Identity Between Contributors and Beneficiaries Defeats Claim of Mutuality Under Income Tax Act, 1961.

24 Apr 2020

The appeal arose from a dispute between Yum! Restaurants (Marketing) Private Limited (YRMPL), a wholly owned subsidiary of Yum! Restaurants (India) Pv...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Reference on Depreciation Rates but Upholds Revenue's Disallowances on Travel Expenses, Medical Reimbursement, Motor Car Perquisite, and Rent as Capital Expenditure. The Court held that depreciation under Section 32 must be allowed at rates as amended from 2.4.1983, while affirming that employee travel expenses after destination are disallowable under Section 39 read with Rule 60, medical reimbursement is part of salary under Section 40(c), actual expenditure on motor cars for directors is to be considered, and rent of Rs.16,91,250/- is capital expenditure.

18 Sep 2012

This is a reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No.5873/Bom/8...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Disallowance Under Section 40(a)(ia) Not Applicable When TDS Deducted and Paid Before Due Date of Filing Return Under Section 139(1). The court upheld the ITAT's order deleting disallowance, holding that the proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) allows deduction if TDS is paid before the due date under Section 139(1).

28 Feb 2014

The case involves three appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the common order of the Income Tax Appel...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies Deduction of Broken Period Interest for Banks Treating Securities as Stock-in-TradeDeduction Allowed as Revenue Expenditure for Banks Holding Securities as Stock-in-Trade

16 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court addressed the treatment of broken period interest for tax purposes. The issue centered on whether broken period interest could be de...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)