Search Results for "Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940"

120 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 120 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Clarifies Legislative Competence on Alcohol Regulation: Potable vs Industrial Alcohol" "A landmark judgment addressing the scope of State and Union powers on regulating alcohol under the Indian Constitution."

The Supreme Court of India revisited the legislative competence concerning the regulation of alcohol under the Constitution. The court examined whethe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Sentence in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case — State's Revision Petition Allowed. Trial Court's Fine of Rs.10,000 Increased to Rs.50,000 for Offence Under Section 27(d) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

The State of Karnataka, through the Drug Inspector, Hassan Circle, filed a Criminal Revision Petition under Section 397 read with 401 of the Code of C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of State of Andhra Pradesh in VAT Classification Dispute. Medical Oxygen IP and Nitrous Oxide IP Held Taxable as Drugs Under Entry 88 of Andhra Pradesh VAT Act at Lower Rate.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals filed by the State of Andhra Pradesh challenging the classification of Medical Oxygen IP and Nitrous Oxide IP ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Drug Price Control Demand Against Pharmaceutical Company. Cream Vs. Ointment Distinction and Small Scale Industry Exemption Under DPCO 1995 Considered.

The writ petition arose from a dispute concerning the drug price control regime under the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1995 (DPCO 1995). The first pet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Mehandi Manufacturer for Lack of Sanction Under Section 32 of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. Sanction order found to be cyclostyled proforma without application of mind, rendering prosecution invalid.

The applicants, Chutararam and Jetharam Gehlot, were the proprietors of 'Prem Mehandi Center', a small manufacturer of henna/mehandi powder and cone p...