Search Results for "Development Control Regulation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Development Control Regulation"

1539 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1539 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Second Appeal in RERA Registration Dispute — Development Agreement Not Required to Be Registered Under Registration Act for Project Registration. The Court held that the Goa Real Estate Regulatory Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by insisting on compulsory registration of a development agreement under Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908, as a precondition for processing a project registration application under Sections 3 and 4 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

18 Jul 2026

The appellant, Edcon Real Estate Developers, a registered partnership firm, filed a Second Appeal under Section 58 of the Real Estate (Regulation and ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Development Rights Certificate in Land Reservation Case. Held That Landowner Entitled to DRC for Entire Reserved Area Under Section 126(1)(c) of MRTP Act, 1966.

8 May 2023

The appellants, Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited and its constituted attorney, owned land bearing CTS No. 2B (part) and 3B in Mumbai, wh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Issuance of Occupation Certificate for Committed Development Under UDCPR Regulation 5.1.3. Development Permission Granted Before Draft Regional Plan Publication Protects Builder's Right to Occupation Certificate Despite Subsequent Agricultural Reservation in Regional Plan.

9 Dec 2024

The petitioner, Raj Realtors, a partnership firm, constructed ten buildings comprising 446 residential and 20 commercial units on land at Mouje Pashan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Height Restriction on Multi-Storied Parking Lots Under DCR 33(24). State Government's Power to Modify Development Control Regulations Under Section 37 of MRTP Act, 1966 Upheld — No Vested Right in Unamended Regulation.

19 Nov 2012

The petitioners, claiming ownership of a plot in Tardeo, Mumbai, challenged a decision of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai contained in a l...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Writ Petition for TDR Against Construction of Development Plan Road. Municipal Corporation's Rejection of TDR Application Set Aside as Unreasonable and Contrary to Development Control Regulations.

15 Mar 2019

The petitioner, M/s. Siddhi Real Estate Developers, a partnership firm, constructed a development plan road at its own cost within the limits of Thane...

High Court

Bombay High Court Resurrects Issue of Mandatory Naval NOC in Development Near Defence Establishments. The Court Examines Validity of Stop Work Notice and Deemed Commencement Certificate Under DCPR 2034, Citing Precedents and Regulatory Vacuum.

5 May 2026

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the stop work notice dated 24 October 2025 issued by MHADA and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Reclassification of Mill Land as Non-NAINA Area Under DCPR 2034. Court upholds Monitoring Committee's decision that land not required for textile industry reverts to municipal reservation for public housing and amenity purposes.

22 Mar 2024

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Glider Buildcon Realtors Pvt Ltd and Mafatlal Industries Ltd challenging the decision of the Monitor...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for TDR in DP Road Development Case — Petitioner Entitled to TDR for Roads Developed and Paid For Under DCR 33(7) and 33(8). The court held that the Petitioner is entitled to Transferable Development Rights (TDR) in the form of Floor Space Index (FSI) equivalent to the area of DP Roads developed and paid for by it, and quashed the rejection by the Respondents.

3 Jul 2020

The Petitioner, M/s Siddhi Real Estate Developers, is the owner of land admeasuring approximately 85,778 sq.mtrs. at village Dhokali, Thane. The Petit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of Clause 10(a) of Appendix III under DCR 33(7) for Redevelopment of Cessed Properties. The Court held that the requirement of 70% consent of occupants is a reasonable restriction and not violative of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the Constitution.

20 Mar 2013

The petitioners, M/s. J. Gala Enterprises and its partner, purchased a property in 1992 comprising cessed and non-cessed structures with about 220 fam...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Tenants Challenging Redevelopment of Dilapidated Building. Tenants' objections under DCPR 2034 rejected as redevelopment was approved by majority and TAC.

4 May 2023

The Bombay High Court dismissed seven writ petitions filed by tenants of a building named 'Haji Manzil' located in Bandra, Mumbai. The building, const...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)