Search Results for "Departmental proceedings barred"

232 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 232 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Appellant's Title and Possession Over Land Not Extinguished by Acquisition Proceedings. The court held that the appellant had locus standi to challenge the acquisition and that the delay was not fatal as possession continued.

The appellant, Sri V Sreenivasaiah, filed a writ appeal against the order dated 25.02.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. No. 2228/2022, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lokayukta Report Against Retired Revenue Inspector for Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Initiation of Departmental Proceedings Set Aside as Allegations of Misappropriation of Government Land Were Not Substantiated by Material on Record.

The petitioner, Sri N. Hanumantha, a retired Sheristedar (formerly Revenue Inspector) in the Office of the Deputy Commissioner, Mandya, filed a writ p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Disciplinary Proceedings Against Retired Government Servant as Barred by Limitation Under Karnataka Civil Services Rules. Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated After Retirement for Events More Than Four Years Old Held Without Jurisdiction Under Rule 214(2)(b)(ii).

The petitioner, a Junior Engineer in the Mysore City Corporation, challenged the disciplinary proceedings initiated after his retirement. He had been ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Dismisses Writ Petition Against Karnataka Administrative Tribunal Order Upholding Lokayukta Enquiry. Court Holds That Challenge to Entrustment of Departmental Enquiry is Premature and Petitioner Can Raise All Contentions After Enquiry Concludes.

The dispute arose from an illegal construction on a civic amenity site under the Mullamari Irrigation Project. In 2007, Smt. Mahananda, an allottee, b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Government Officer Due to Bar Under Civil Services Rules — Prosecution for Misappropriation of Funds Held Barred by Rule 214(3) and (6) of Karnataka Civil Services Rules, 1958 as Sanction Was Not Obtained.

The petitioner, a former Block Development Officer, was accused of misappropriating Rs.11,47,360/- during 2004-2005. An FIR was registered under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition as Time-Barred Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Service of Arbitral Award Deemed Complete Upon Acknowledgment by Relative at Petitioner's Address.

The petitioners, Francisco A. D'Souza and the legal heirs of Oscar de Souza, filed an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Partnership Dispute Despite Objections to Earlier Appointee. Court Holds That Arbitration Clause Survives Dissolution and Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Empowers Court to Appoint Arbitrator When Parties Fail to Agree.

The applicants, partners of a dissolved partnership firm, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeki...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Arbitral Award in BOT Bridge Construction Dispute. Arbitrator's Findings on Extra Work and Interest Upheld as Within Jurisdiction and Not Perverse.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Executive Engineer, Public Works Division, Miraj, filed two appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Extra Departmental Agent Challenging Dismissal for Misappropriation. Departmental Enquiry Charge of Misappropriating Rs.100 Proved by Preponderance of Probabilities, No Perversity Found.

The petitioner, Ramdas Shankarrao Digraskar, was appointed as an Extra Departmental Agent (E.D.A.) on 5.8.1983 and later promoted to Extra Departmenta...