Search Results for "Demolition and reconstruction"

151 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 151 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA Due to Pending Title Dispute. Availability of Alternate Civil Suit Remedy Renders Writ Petition Under Article 227 Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, M/s. Blue Heaven Co-op Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Heritage Market Buildings. Heritage Classification Does Not Bar Demolition for Public Safety Under Section 2(1ea) of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961.

The petitioners, residents of Mysuru, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Part Occupation Certificate for Building Height Violation. Flat Purchasers Cannot Seek Revocation of Occupation Certificate as They Have Alternative Remedy Under RERA and No Vested Right to Challenge Planning Permissions.

The petitioners, Sanjay Phulwaria and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Reconstruction of Servant Quarters in Cantonment Area. Reconstruction Without Prior Sanction Under Section 238 of Cantonments Act, 2006 Constitutes Unauthorized Construction Justifying Demolition Under Section 248(1).

The petitioner, an occupant of residential premises within the Pune Cantonment Board limits, obtained sanction for building plans on 6 May 2008 under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Sheds by Municipal Corporation. Petitioner Failed to Produce Authorization Under Section 351 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, Hence Demolition Upheld.

The petitioner, M/s Sub Vijay International Pvt Ltd, owned property bearing CTS No. 11A in Aksa, Borivali, Mumbai. On 13th April 1999, the Deputy Cont...