Search Results for "Dealer Status"

176 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 176 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retail Outlet Dealership Selection for Arbitrary Marking. Court directs reassessment of marks for 'Liquid cash' criterion and fresh selection process.

The petitioner, Shri Pundalik Tukaram Chowgule, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the selection process for a Reta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Rejection of Candidature for Retail Outlet Dealership Due to Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's Candidature Was Rejected on Grounds Not Mentioned in the Advertisement or Brochure, and Without Providing an Opportunity to Explain.

The petitioner, Nikhil Dilipsing Rajput, applied for a retail outlet dealership pursuant to an advertisement dated 25.11.2018 issued by the Indian Oil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Reassessment Orders Against Corporate Dealers in KVAT Cases; Holds Inter-Branch Transfers Not Taxable as Sale. Branch Registration Under Section 38(6) Does Not Create Separate Legal Personality for Levy of VAT.

The batch of writ petitions was filed by corporate entities, including M/s Wipro Enterprises (P) Ltd and M/s Chamundeshwari Build Tech Pvt. Ltd, chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Tax on Hire Purchase Components Under Bombay Sales Tax Act — Option Money, Insurance, and Hire Premium Included in Sale Price. Hire Purchase Transaction Constitutes a Sale and Resale Deduction Under Section 8 Not Available.

The case involves two sales tax references under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal. The applicant, M/s. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Housing Loan Disbursement — No Privity of Contract Between Complainant and Bank. Complainant Not a 'Consumer' Under Section 2(1)(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as No Service Was Hired or Availed from the Appellant Bank.

The present appeal arises from a consumer complaint filed by the respondent (original complainant) against the appellant bank before the National Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Revenue's Challenge Against CESTAT Order Setting Aside Service Tax Demand on Oil Companies for CNG Sale. Dispute Concerns Classification of CNG Sale by BPCL and HPCL as Business Auxiliary Service under Section 65(19) of Finance Act, 1994.

The present civil appeals before the Supreme Court, filed by the Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai, under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excise Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Telecom Companies' Appeals, Upholding Tax Deduction at Source Under Section 194H on Discounts to Distributors. Relationship Between Telecom Companies and Distributors Held to Be Principal-Agent, Making Discounts Liable as Commission for Tax Deduction Purposes.

Multiple telecom companies, including Bharti Airtel Limited, Vodafone Essar South Limited, and Tata Teleservices Limited, filed appeals under Section ...