Search Results for "Copyright Registration"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Copyright Registration"

168 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 168 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Rectification of Trade Mark Registrations for 'WHISPER' and 'ALWAYS' Marks — Petitioner's Prior Use and Well-Known Status Established, Respondent's Registration Cancelled.

6 Jan 2026

The petitioner, The Procter & Gamble Company, a multinational corporation, filed three original petitions under Sections 47, 57, and 125 of the Trade ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Copyright Infringement Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Copying. The court held that mere similarity in compilation of questions does not constitute infringement under Sections 63 and 65 of Copyright Act, 1957, and no dishonest intention for cheating under Section 420 IPC was made out.

25 Sep 2018

The applicants (Maroti Kamlapure, Vitthal Bayas, and Chaya Shinde) filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Copyright Infringement Case Due to Private Complaint Mechanism — Police Acted as Conduit for Private Party Without Proper Authorization. The court held that the criminal process cannot be used as a tool for recovery of dues or to settle private scores, and quashed the FIR under Section 482 CrPC read with Article 226 of the Constitution.

9 Feb 2018

The petitioner, Nirav Danishkumar Shah, a partner of M/s. AU Finja Jewels, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Infringement of Well-Known Mark 'Raymond' in Domain Name for Dissimilar Goods; Discusses Scope of Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Domain Name 'raymondpharma.com' Not Found to Infringe 'Raymond' Mark Under Section 29(4) Due to Dissimilar Goods and Prior Litigation Bar.

20 Jul 2016

The dispute arose from the Plaintiff Raymond Limited's claim that the Defendant Raymond Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. infringed its well-known registered t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Copyright Infringement Case, Upholding High Court's Restoration of Suit for Trial. The Court held that rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC was premature as factual issues regarding applicability of Section 15(2) of Copyright Act, 1957, required determination on merits regarding whether engineering drawings constituted a 'design' under Designs Act, 2000, and were reproduced more than fifty times by industrial process.

15 Apr 2025

The Supreme Court adjudicated appeals arising from a copyright infringement dispute between Inox India Limited (the respondent) and Cryogas Equipment ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds IPAB Order Expunging Trademark 'Creative' for Deceptive Similarity in Travel Services. Petitioner's mark 'Creative Tours & Travels' held deceptively similar to respondent's registered mark 'Creative Travel', causing confusion among consumers under Section 9(2)(a) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

4 May 2016

The petitioner, Creative Tours & Travels (India) Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Appeal in Trade Mark Infringement Case Where Corporate Name Used for Dissimilar Goods. Court Examines Whether Section 29(4) or 29(5) of Trade Marks Act, 1999 Applies When Registered Mark Is Part of Tradename for Unrelated Pharmaceuticals.

13 Jul 2010

The appeal arose from a suit filed by Raymond Limited (plaintiff) against Raymond Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. (defendant) for trade mark infringement. T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark and Copyright Infringement Suit Over Soybean Oil Labels — Deceptive Similarity Established Despite Minor Variations. The court held that the defendant's label for soybean oil was deceptively similar to the plaintiff's registered label mark and artistic work, and granted an interim injunction under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and the Copyright Act, 1957.

9 Mar 2021

The plaintiff, Sanjay Soya Private Limited, filed a suit for trademark and copyright infringement against the defendant, Narayani Trading Company, all...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case. 'ULTRATUFF' Held Deceptively Similar to 'ULTRATECH CEMENT' Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

18 Nov 2011

The respondent-plaintiff, Ultratech Cement Limited, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the appellants-defendants, Alaknan...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case Under Trade Marks Act, 1999. Registered Trademark 'RENAISSANCE' Found Infringed by 'SAI RENAISSANCE' Due to Deceptive Similarity and Transborder Reputation Under Section 29(4).

19 Jan 2022

The appeal arose from a trademark infringement dispute between an appellant-plaintiff, a global hotel chain incorporated in Delaware, USA, and respond...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)