Search Results for "Concurrent User"

266 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 266 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Landlord's Eviction Suit Under Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. Acquisition of Alternative Residence by Tenant Not Ground for Eviction When Premises Let for Composite Purpose of Residence and Profession Under Section 14(1)(h).

The dispute originated from a tenancy entered into by an advocate, the predecessor-in-interest of the respondents, who took on rent certain premises f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlords' Petition in Eviction Suit Based on Non-User and Bonafide Requirement. Tenant's Non-User of Suit Premises for Six Years Held to Be with Reasonable Cause Due to Landlords' Conduct.

The petitioners, landlords of a shop premises, filed a suit for eviction against the respondent tenant on grounds of non-user for six years without re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Adjudicates Trademark Opposition Over 'Big Bite' Mark in Class 30. Court Considers Application of Prior User Test and Relevance of Trans-Border Reputation Under Trademarks Act, 1999.

The appeals were filed under Section 91 of the Trademarks Act, 1999 against a common order dated 18.7.2014 by the Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Decree in Landlord-Tenant Dispute. Concurrent findings of default in payment of rent and subletting without consent upheld under Section 108 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Order 20 Rule 12 CPC.

The petitioners, Orbit Super Market Private Limited and the legal heirs of Dr. Shrikant Jichkar, challenged concurrent orders of the trial court and a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Opposition Case — Registration of Device Mark Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence of Use. The Court held that the Registrar erred in accepting user claim without proper documentary evidence, and that the appellant's prior use since 1992 was established.

The appellant, Ganesh Consumer Products Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, against an order dated 11.09.2024 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications in Rent Control Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Tenancy and Subletting. Landlord's claim for possession under Section 16 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 fails as subletting was not proved and tenant's possession was lawful.

The case involves two civil revision applications arising from a dispute between the landlords (M/s. K. B. Lahoti and Company and others) and the tena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Decree in Rent Control Case — Concurrent Findings of Default and Non-User Not Interfered With. Tenant's Failure to Pay Rent and Non-User of Premises for Stated Purpose Justify Eviction Under Bombay Rents, Hotel & Lodging Houses Rates Control Act, 1947.

The Supreme Court dismissed two civil appeals arising from a landlord-tenant dispute over eviction. The plaintiff purchased the suit property in 1986 ...