Search Results for "Commissioner Clarification"

963 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 963 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Tags Civil Appeals and Transfer Cases on Inter Se Seniority Between Direct Recruit and Promotees in Income Tax Department. Core Question is Whether Seniority of Direct Recruits Should be Based on Date of Appointment or Date of Vacancy.

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals and transfer cases concerning the inter se seniority dispute between direct recruits and pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Reassessment Order Due to Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Application of Mind. Collector's order set aside for failing to consider petitioner's objections and relying on unsubstantiated ready reckoner rates without providing opportunity of hearing.

The petitioner, Crystal Construction Company, challenged an order dated 16 September 2021 passed by the Collector of Stamps, Andheri, which adjudicate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Housing Board Against High Court Order Directing Arbitration Tribunal to Entertain Fresh Claim Despite Prior Arbitral Award. Principle of Issue Estoppel and Finality of Award Under Arbitration Act, 1996 Applied.

The case involves three civil appeals by the Madhya Pradesh Housing and Infrastructure Development Board against a common judgment of the Madhya Prade...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Clarification Denying Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme Benefit to Warehoused Raw Materials. Customs Authorities' Orders Declining KVSS Benefit for Imported Raw Materials Stored in Bonded Warehouse Upheld as Per Ministry Clarification.

The petitioners, ex-partners of M/s. Zuari Stainless Steel Industries, a 100% export-oriented unit, imported raw materials (steel sheets in coils) whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...