Search Results for "Coextensive Liability"

31 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 31 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Labourer Death. Insurer Liable Despite Alleged Commercial Use of Tractor Trolley as Policy Covered Labourers and No Breach Proved.

The appeal was filed by The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. against the judgment and award dated 02.02.2000 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Allows Appeal Against Admission of CIRP Due to Discharge of Debt Through One-Time Settlement. Financial Debt Found to Be Fully Satisfied Prior to Filing of Section 7 Application Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

The present appeal was filed under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) by Mr. Puneet Resutra, the erstwhile Director and Shar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows SICOM Petition to Enforce Guarantee Liability Under State Financial Corporations Act, 1951. Guarantors' Defense of Discharge Due to Variation in Contract Rejected as Guarantees Were Continuing and No Material Alteration Occurred.

The petition was filed by SICOM Ltd., a State Financial Corporation, under Sections 31(1)(aa) and 32 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Dispute — Upholds Consumer Fora Orders for Compensation. Ownership of Vehicle Not Transferred Despite Sale Agreement; Insurer Liable to Pay Claim Amount with Interest.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Surendra Kumar Bhilawe against The New India Assurance Company Limited, setting aside the National Commi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Arbitral Award Holding Stockbroker Liable for Unauthorized Trades by Agent. Broker Failed to Prove Client Authorization for Disputed Trades, Resulting in Compensation of Rs.14,37,200/- to Client.

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by IIFL Capital Services Limited (formerly IIFL Secu...