Search Results for "Cash Compensatory Support"

26 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 26 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Court upholds award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

The petitioner, Ramakrishnan Krishnan, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in ESI Act Case — Conveyance Allowance Excluded from Wages Under Section 2(22)(b). Conveyance allowance paid to employees for actual travel expenses is not 'wages' under the ESI Act, 1948, and no contribution is payable on such amount.

The appellant, Paramount Agencies Pvt. Ltd., a company covered under the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, received a letter dated 31.01.1991 from...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Insurance Dispute Despite Insurer's Denial of Liability. Arbitration Clause in Comprehensive Mega Risks Insurance Policy Held to Survive Repudiation of Claim.

The applicant, Essar Steel India Ltd., filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Interest on Refund of TDS Under Section 244A of Income Tax Act — Mandamus Issued for Payment of Interest on Delayed Refund. CBDT Communication Denying Interest Held Contrary to Statutory Provisions and Quashed.

The petitioner, M/s. Sunflag Iron & Steel Co. Ltd., a public limited company engaged in steel manufacturing, entered into an agreement with a German c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 57 — Failure to Inform Immediate Superior Officer Renders Search and Seizure Illegal. The court held that strict compliance with Section 57 of the NDPS Act, 1985 is mandatory and non-compliance vitiates the conviction.

The appellant, Ruffus Leo Manuel, was convicted by the NDPS Court at Mapusa under Section 20(b)(ii) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances ...